Introductory Thread V2

[Wishindo]

I'm back, better than ever (though probably still "Unsaved Trash^tm" and now with a new style - arguing with a false bible^{the truth}, and without quote digging!^{the best}

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

On another note, how does one superscript?

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Interested in budget allocation of a landover state - James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." and Exodus 21:12 "Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death." means no need for prisons, as all found guilty are executed.

And what about authorities who are clearly corrupt like Cuba, China and the Electoral College? Romans 13:1-5 "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, tan avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience." Clearly states that these happen out of God's own will.

[Elmer G. White]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

I'm back, better than ever (though probably still "Unsaved Trash^tm" and now with a new style - arguing with a false bible^{the truth}, and without quote digging!^{the best}

Dear Sinner,

I must admit that I understand absolutely nothing of this. Is this demonic AI code? Is this the "new style"? It reminds me of a vile, repulsive sinner author, Mr. George Bernard Shaw (as you are not a True Christian™, I surmise that you understand better the musings of another sinners instead of Jesus®):

LIZA:...Here! what are you sniggering at?
FREDDY:The new small talk. You do it so awfully well.

We are not very keen on these "new styles".

2 Corinthians 3:12
Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:

On another note, how does one superscript?

Luke 10:41-42
And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.

Don't you see!? You're distracted! You're lost! You do not concentrate on the necessities, the Bible©. Instead, you're worried about the external appearance of your (not the most well-formulated, you must admit) post.

One thing is needful.

Jesus!



Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

It appears that I used the wrong bible for the quotes on the post, but the meaning is the same.

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishindo
I'm back, better than ever (though probably still "Unsaved Trash^tm" and now with a new style - arguing with a false bible^{the truth}, and without quote digging!^{the best}

Dear Sinner,

I must admit that I understand absolutely nothing of this. Is this demonic AI code? Is this the "new style"? It reminds me of a vile, repulsive sinner author, Mr. George Bernard Shaw (as you are not a True Christian™, I surmise that you understand better the musings of another sinners instead of Jesus®):

LIZA:...Here! what are you sniggering at?
FREDDY:The new small talk. You do it so awfully well.

We are not very keen on these "new styles".

2 Corinthians 3:12
Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech: Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishindo
On another note, how does one superscript?

Luke 10:41-42
And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.

Don't you see!? You're distracted! You're lost! You do not concentrate on the necessities, the Bible©. Instead, you're worried about the external appearance of your (not the most well-formulated, you must admit) post.

One thing is needful.

Jesus!



Yours in Christ,

Elmer

Congrats on achieving "Do as I say, not as I do" - 2 Corinthians 3:12 "Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:" Says no formatting need be beyond hyperlinks (other forum posts, bible quotes) and quotes (so one knows what part of the post is being discussed. Meaning no font colors, bolding, italicizing, underlining and definitely not bulky scrolling images of a puppy-eyed demigod.

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Read your dolphin post. Satan has also used men to rape innocent Godly men and boychildren. And not all dolphins do such things, so what is the difference?

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Two other major wrongs:1) Scripture or it didn't happen - why extermination?
2) Genesis 1:28 states "Subdue...every living thing that moveth upon the earth" which means I could subdue you, or you subdue me. There is no line drawn.

[Roland]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Read your dolphin post. Satan has also used men to rape innocent Godly men and boychildren. And not all dolphins do such things, so what is the difference?

Hello Indo,

Are you high? And if so, what did you use?

Kind regards,

Roland

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

On "Dolphins and Evolution!" (http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=11946): Another study, same but performed with newborn males, with the controls being the fathers, was performed to the worst desert of all - Antarctica. The trials showed that, men, the best species according to God, themselves can't handle a little relocation.Conclusions:

• Evilution may indeed work, but only across inconceivably long periods of time. Further research necessary
• City-going men don't how to survive on their own.
• "The Son of God became the Son of Man so that Sons of Men may be Sons of God." would result in Man becomes brother of God, which would undermine God's authority, and therefore never happened.

[Roland]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

On "Dolphins and Evolution!" (http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=11946): Another study, same but performed with newborn males, with the controls being the fathers, was performed to the worst desert of all - Antarctica. The trials showed that, men, the best species according to God, themselves can't handle a little relocation.Conclusions:
blah blah]

Try again Indo. I might not be a Christian but even I can understand the difference between newborn males and born again Christians.

Shees.

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

You have given me two infractions, one for "Butchering the American language", and another for "Abusing the Report Post function". Please tell me what parts of post 1186217 constitute as "Butchering the American language?" And reporting the person was not for "the glorification of your silly ego." but rather the betterment of the community as a whole. He ignored thread 35622, which is the one that introduces the of Burden of Proof. He was also wasting Jesus's precious time on the glorification of his silly ego.

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Try again Indo. I might not be a Christian but even I can understand the difference between newborn males and born again Christians.

Shees.

I can too. Had it been "born again Christians" it would've read "born again males" or "reborn males" I'm clearly on drugs.

[Wishindo]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

Please tell me how I can correct my behavior, so as to not provoke another exceptionally long ban.

[Roland]

Re: Introductory Thread V2

I can too. Had it been "born again Christians" it would've read "born again males" or "reborn males" I'm clearly on drugs.

Hello Indo,

It was you who was equating newborn males with Born Again Christians™. You try to counter with a flimsy executed fallacy, you should know better. As I see it you are trying to avert from my question: What drugs are you using?

Roland