[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

P.s. You mentioned earlier on that they had pouches ... where is your proof for this?

[Wide-Open]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

No I cannot support this idiocy with scripture as humans wrote the bible not God - why can't you see this???

To use your own words: where is your proof for this?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Fossil evidence. Now where is yours? and could you answer the remaining questions please

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

How do you explain DNA that supports evolutionary theories?

DNA does not support evolution. Actually, it effectively prevents the changing of one species into another. For example, because of their DNA reptiles can't possibly "evolve" into marsupials, not even over a period of "millions and millions of years". Therefore, DNA successfully exposes the evolution lie.

And in response to an earlier question: evolution is not an appearance of species just like that, it is a gradual change over time!

If a frog turns into a handsome prince quickly it's called a "fairy tale" but if a frog turns into handsome prince slowly it's called "modern science". Don't you see a huge gap in logic there?

P.s. You mentioned earlier on that they had pouches ... where is your proof for this?

That proof has already been provided HERE.

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Sorry, my mistake - I misunderstood your question. So your telling me that God pulled out a big pen and started writing?? - Yes some may have been spoken to God but not all! What was to stop someone like me when it was wrote adding a chapter to it and saying God told me to write this?

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

So your [sic] telling me that God pulled out a big pen and started writing?

If you dictate a letter to your secretary and she puts it down word for word, who gets credit for writing that letter?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Isaiah: I do not think you have any concept or have even looked into evolution properly without your narrow minded vision! Why can reptiles not evolve? - you make no sense! - explain how DNA can vary among population and yet share common ancestry? - thus often forming new species. It takes millions of years for species to form and adapt to an environment often via separation!

You have not provided any proof by linking me to that page? - where does it mention a pouch? If muscle isn't preserved you can be damn sure skin won't be!

Now seen as you avoid all skeletal questions as it is clear you can't get around the fact that they are significantly different ... could you answer why dentition in T rex's are shaped and arranged as such please?

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Isaiah: I do not think you have any concept or have even looked into evolution properly without your narrow minded vision! Why can reptiles not evolve? - you make no sense! - explain how DNA can vary among population and yet share common ancestry? - thus often forming new species.

Evolution can't be true simply because GOD HIMSELF says so in the Bible.

Genesis 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

It takes millions of years for species to form and adapt to an environment often via separation

Except that the Earth isn't "millions and millions of years old" and that is yet another PROOF that the theory of evolution is a lie.

You have not provided any proof by linking me to that page? - where does it mention a pouch? If muscle isn't preserved you can be damn sure skin won't be!

If you want to know more about the Kangarosaurus Rex, click HERE!

Now seen as you avoid all skeletal questions as it is clear you can't get around the fact that they are significantly different ... could you answer why dentition in T rex's are shaped and arranged as such please?

The skeletal structures of the two are completely identical except for the size. You might want to have your eyes checked if you fail to see that.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

appearance of species just like that, it is a gradual change over time!

If God wanted to change things He could do it very quickly. Just look how he changes a little tadpole into a beautiful butterfly!

YiC

Jack

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

I have discovered more evidence that supports my research!

Procoptodon was a genus of giant short-faced kangaroo living in Australia during the Pleistocene epoch. P. goliah, the largest kangaroo that ever existed, stood approximately 2 meters (6'7") tall. They weighed about 230 kilograms (510 lb).

Giant short-faced kangaroos had a flat face and forward-pointing eyes. On each foot they had a single large toe somewhat similar in appearance like a horse's hoof. On these unusual feet they moved quickly through the open forests and plains, where they sought grass and leaves to eat. Their front were equally strange: each front paw had two extra-long fingers with large claws. It is possible that they were used to grab branches, bringing leaves within eating distance. <atheist nonsense removed> Their demise is usually attributed to human activities, but this remains uncertain.


Fossils of giant short-faced kangaroos have been found at the Naracoorte World Heritage fossil deposits in South Australia, Lake Menindee in New South Wales, Darling Downs in Queensland, and at many other sites. A full-size, life-like replica is on permanent display with other ancient native Australian animals at the Australian Museum.

It is quite clear that the Procoptodon Kangaroo is the missing link between the pre-flood and the modern eras. It shows in great detail the Kangaroo's shrinking process and gives us a thorough idea of how it may have looked like about 1000 years after the flood!

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It is quite clear that the Procoptodon Kangaroo is the missing link between the pre-flood and the modern eras.

Though I certainly commend you for your unassailable logic and thorough scientific research, I must say I'm uncomfortable with the term "missing link," is it implies some sort of evolutionary process.

I'm quite confident you're not implying that modern kangaroos evolved out of antediluvian giant kangaroos. More than likely, God liked the basic kangaroo design so much that He just couldn't bear to think of them disappearing altogether, so He made new ones whose sizes were more compatible with the post-flood environment.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Though I certainly commend you for your unassailable logic and thorough scientific research, I must say I'm uncomfortable with the term "missing link," is it implies some sort of evolutionary process.

I understand your concerns, Brother, but I think it's quite clear that I did not intend it to imply any evolutionary process. It would be more correct saying that atheist scientists pre-stole this term in order to support their lies.

I'm quite confident you're not implying that modern kangaroos evolved out of antediluvian giant kangaroos. More than likely, God liked the basic kangaroo design so much that He just couldn't bear to think of them disappearing altogether, so He made new ones whose sizes were more compatible with the post-flood environment.

If you would have bothered to read my research you would know that God did not re-create the Kangaroo. They merely shrunk due to lower oxygen levels and more ultraviolet radiation after the flood. As my "missing link" evidence proves, this was indeed the case.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

OK, just as long as this shrinking process is grounded in valid Biblical science, and not some wild Darwinian fantasy, I'm OK with it.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

OK, just as long as this shrinking process is grounded in valid Biblical science, and not some wild Darwinian fantasy, I'm OK with it.

As a True Scientist™, I can assure you that this is all well grounded in Biblical science.

[HolyDischarge]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Dr. Isaiah Jones

I need to know more.. i cant find it in biblez