Democrats Attempt to Take Over Presidency
By Reverend Dr. Davidson
Feb 17, 2007: Washington DC
In what can only be described as an attempted coo, Democrats in the House of Representatives passed a ‘non-binding’ resolution that calls President Bush’s leadership into question. The resolution passed, by a vote of 246 – 182, and Washington DC Democrats just can’t seem to shut up about it. The resolution gives far less latitude for the president to take action, if he needed to. This is a direct violation to the powers given to the president in the constitution.
"This is an important moment," said Zbigniew Brzezinski. “The resolution,” he said, "tells the president that the country's increasingly tired of the war and the country's reaction to his provoking a new war would be even worse."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her close adviser, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), are devising a strategy to tie Bush's hands by placing conditions on future funding for the war, such as requiring any units sent to Iraq to meet certain standards for training, equipment and rest between deployments. They plan to make the requirements so hard, that many units would never be deployed.
What do people think about this Democratic coo? "If Congress proceeds to throttle the president's strategy, then it will seriously undercut the ability of future presidents to do what they need to do to protect the nation in a time of war," said James Phillips, a foreign policy scholar at the Heritage Foundation. "It's a mistake to think you can effectively run a war by committee."
Many have voiced their opinions supporting Bush, but have been dropped by liberal media. The message being sent to the country is, “If you don’t support the Democrats, you will not be heard in the national media.”
Many parallels can be pointed out about this Democratic congress and party battles of the past. The first congress investigated George Washington after a Native American uprising, the Mexican-American War, and the Civil War, World War I, and the Vietnam War. Congress has consistently backstabbed the president since this nation’s beginning.
What this congress is doing differently, is it is trying to take away executive powers given to the president and placed firmly into the hands of congress. On a Navy ship this action would be called mutiny, punishable by firing squad. No one can know what the future will bring for President Bush, but it’s clear he will have to battle congress every day instead of protecting America.
By Reverend Dr. Davidson
Feb 17, 2007: Washington DC
In what can only be described as an attempted coo, Democrats in the House of Representatives passed a ‘non-binding’ resolution that calls President Bush’s leadership into question. The resolution passed, by a vote of 246 – 182, and Washington DC Democrats just can’t seem to shut up about it. The resolution gives far less latitude for the president to take action, if he needed to. This is a direct violation to the powers given to the president in the constitution.
"This is an important moment," said Zbigniew Brzezinski. “The resolution,” he said, "tells the president that the country's increasingly tired of the war and the country's reaction to his provoking a new war would be even worse."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her close adviser, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), are devising a strategy to tie Bush's hands by placing conditions on future funding for the war, such as requiring any units sent to Iraq to meet certain standards for training, equipment and rest between deployments. They plan to make the requirements so hard, that many units would never be deployed.
What do people think about this Democratic coo? "If Congress proceeds to throttle the president's strategy, then it will seriously undercut the ability of future presidents to do what they need to do to protect the nation in a time of war," said James Phillips, a foreign policy scholar at the Heritage Foundation. "It's a mistake to think you can effectively run a war by committee."
Many have voiced their opinions supporting Bush, but have been dropped by liberal media. The message being sent to the country is, “If you don’t support the Democrats, you will not be heard in the national media.”
Many parallels can be pointed out about this Democratic congress and party battles of the past. The first congress investigated George Washington after a Native American uprising, the Mexican-American War, and the Civil War, World War I, and the Vietnam War. Congress has consistently backstabbed the president since this nation’s beginning.
What this congress is doing differently, is it is trying to take away executive powers given to the president and placed firmly into the hands of congress. On a Navy ship this action would be called mutiny, punishable by firing squad. No one can know what the future will bring for President Bush, but it’s clear he will have to battle congress every day instead of protecting America.
Comment