[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

YOU are the only one who posited sudden change.

How do you explain the sudden change in the coloration of the English Moth (well documented) in response to the use of coal in the 19th century?

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

How do you explain the sudden change in the coloration of the English Moth (well documented) in response to the use of coal in the 19th century?

They didn't change color. When the increase in coal use caused soot to be deposited everywhere, the lighter colored moths were more visible to predators, and were more likely to be eaten. The darker colored moths were camoflauged by the soot, not eaten by predators, and survived to produce young.

[Peter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

• If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Sharks still have enough food in the water so they don't need to come to land.

• If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?

It's not because there was a flood on Mars that there was a flood here.

• If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Normally they would die, but by the medical knowledge we can let them live.

• If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Because we don't need 3 arms, we can live perfectly with 2 arms.

• If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

Some people don't want children, because they aren't ready for children yet, or if they just don't like children.

• If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

The dead bodies get consumed by fungus or worms.
Well evolutionist, I am waiting.

Jesus sees your dirty words Peter

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Jesus sees your dirty words Peter Some people don't want children, because they aren't ready for children yet, or if they just don't like children.

Wrong sinner! If the Magical Monkey Man Theory was true then humans would be frantic not to kill their children. The very though should fill a human with horror. The very fact that we can kill our childern proves there is a God and evolution is wrong.

Jesus sees your dirty words Peter The dead bodies get consumed by fungus or worms.

The mass of a 150 billion bodies is sill going to be there.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Wrong sinner! If the Magical Monkey Man Theory was true then humans would be frantic not to kill their children. The very though should fill a human with horror. The very fact that we can kill our childern proves there is a God and evolution is wrong.



The mass of a 150 billion bodies is sill going to be there.

Much of human body mass is water.

[G-Baby]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Wrong sinner! If the Magical Monkey Man Theory was true then humans would be frantic not to kill their children. The very though should fill a human with horror. The very fact that we can kill our childern proves there is a God and evolution is wrong.
And how does it do so...

The mass of a 150 billion bodies is sTill going to be there.

Like organic stuff, yes. Not as bodies...

[Peter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

Wrong sinner! If the Magical Monkey Man Theory was true then humans would be frantic not to kill their children. The very though should fill a human with horror. The very fact that we can kill our childern proves there is a God and evolution is wrong.


We sometimes don't want children, because the earth is already overpopulated so it's actually logic that we want to limit the number of humans alive.


The mass of a 150 billion bodies is sill going to be there.

All the atoms are still there, but other combinations.
Ever heard of the food chain?
I shall explain it: The fungus and worms consume the dead bodies, the worms and fungus get eaten by bigger animals who get eaten by other animals,... At the end of this chain are the humans, so actually we eat always a little bit of our ancestors, but in other organic combinations that we know as food.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

We sometimes don't want children, because the earth is already overpopulated so it's actually logic that we want to limit the number of humans alive.

Logic has nothing to do with it. If we were just hairless apes, like your failing theory has it, we have an overriding inspective urge to preserve our children’s lives at all costs. After all the future, genetically speaking, is the children so the parent who does his utmost to preserve their life is the one most likely to pass their genes on.

No, the ability to slaughter our children without hesitation because it is the logical, not instinctive, thing to do argues against a biological origin of man. Only a benevolent supreme being could gift humanity with the ruthlessness to callously dispatch it’s own young because reason tells it to. Nature tells man to preserve their kids, God tells man to butcher them.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

Logic has nothing to do with it. If we were just hairless apes, like your failing theory has it, we have an overriding inspective urge to preserve our children’s lives at all costs. After all the future, genetically speaking, is the children so the parent who does his utmost to preserve their life is the one most likely to pass their genes on.

No, the ability to slaughter our children without hesitation because it is the logical, not instinctive, thing to do argues against a biological origin of man. Only a benevolent supreme being could gift humanity with the ruthlessness to callously dispatch it’s own young because reason tells it to. Nature tells man to preserve their kids, God tells man to butcher them.

Not so. Nature sometimes tells females to eat their young. It does not seek to preserve all progeny equally.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

Not so. Nature sometimes tells females to eat their young. It does not seek to preserve all progeny equally.

That still is instinct! I am talking about killing your children out of cold logic. Only God can give you that.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

That still is instinct! I am talking about killing your children out of cold logic. Only God can give you that.

A highly developed brain gives the capacity for logic. Other animals have some capacity for problem-solving, just not to the same degree.

[Peter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

Logic has nothing to do with it. If we were just hairless apes, like your failing theory has it

We EVOLVED from apes, that's totally different.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can answer, and creationist can't

We EVOLVED from apes, that's totally different.

No it is not, by your theory we still are apes. Secularist put Homo Sapians under the family Hominidae.

[Betty Lambskin]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

They didn't change color. When the increase in coal use caused soot to be deposited everywhere, the lighter colored moths were more visible to predators, and were more likely to be eaten. The darker colored moths were camoflauged by the soot, not eaten by predators, and survived to produce young.

I can't help but see this as a lovely metaphor for LBC! As in the soot of sin that causes wussy Christians to be eaten by God, while those that get down and dirty for Jesus get to mate again and again and again! PRAISE jESUS!

[Talitha]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

They didn't change color. When the increase in coal use caused soot to be deposited everywhere, the lighter colored moths were more visible to predators, and were more likely to be eaten. The darker colored moths were camoflauged by the soot, not eaten by predators, and survived to produce young.

Are you being Racist?