[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by BelieverInGod

So everything a scientist says is true right?

What about the planet Vulcan?
Spontaneous generation?
The expanding earth?
Phlogiston theory?
Ether?
Martian canals?
Blank slate theory?
Phrenology?
Einsteins static universe?
Cold fusion?
Bucky balls?
Newtons law of Motion?
Pluto?
The periodic table of elements?

All of these have "respected scientists" who say they're wrong.


Of course you can prove this?




Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?


No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.



Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.


I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?


Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.


Which specific "theory" are you talking about?

>So everything a scientist says is true right?
No. I said nothing of the sort.

>Of course you can prove this?
No, I can't. But you can't prove he is real, either. Atheists and Science have theories and such.
You have a book.

>Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?
Coincidences.

>No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.
No, I know exactly what I'm talking about. You could at least try to argue against them, they're well-thought-out. The least you could do is acknowledge them, and maybe try to prove them wrong. Until you do, I have the upper hand in saying if God exists or not.

>Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.
I've justified my points just fine. Time for you to try.

>I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?
Act your age* and that's off topic. It was most obviously a rhetorical question.

>Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.
Simply a matter of opinion. I am right, I know I am. Lots of people agree with me. Two of which have posted in this thread, and are both Atheist. One of which you banned for no apparent reason. Ask Moogitar if he agrees with everything I have said.

>Which specific "theory" are you talking about?
Look at who I was replying to. The theory that you didn't want to look at because of it being a theory. My theories to get around God not existing.

[Lycia The Repentant]

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

[Lisa H]

Originally Posted by Can I justify that

>So everything a scientist says is true right?
No. I said nothing of the sort.

>Of course you can prove this?
No, I can't. But you can't prove he is real, either. Atheists and Science have theories and such.
You have a book.

>Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?
Coincidences.

>No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.
No, I know exactly what I'm talking about. You could at least try to argue against them, they're well-thought-out. The least you could do is acknowledge them, and maybe try to prove them wrong. Until you do, I have the upper hand in saying if God exists or not.

>Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.
I've justified my points just fine. Time for you to try.

>I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?
Act your age* and that's off topic. It was most obviously a rhetorical question.

>Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.
Simply a matter of opinion. I am right, I know I am. Lots of people agree with me. Two of which have posted in this thread, and are both Atheist. One of which you banned for no apparent reason. Ask Moogitar if he agrees with everything I have said.

>Which specific "theory" are you talking about?
Look at who I was replying to. The theory that you didn't want to look at because of it being a theory. My theories to get around God not existing.

You idea of atheism is really misguided. You do not know what you are talking about. Whenever someone proves you wrong you have to make a derogatory remark. You made derogatory remark towards me by saying I am 12. Yet when someone says to you to act your age you complain it's off topic. You cannot have it both ways. So just admit you have been proven wrong and God exists.

[James Hutchins]

Originally Posted by Can I justify that

Science most certainly does not "guess." They prove it with reality, they don't take utter bullshit from a book and believe it. They do experiments and prove the theories.

God is not reality. You're so naive.


Theories are all you have. Theories are all I have. You have no proof whatsoever that the Bible is true. There's no way to prove it. And you still haven't. What else am I gonna say? Theories are all anyone has. You have no REAL proof that he exists, and I don't have much REAL proof he doesn't. But you still didn't acknowledge my arguments, most likely because you know they were right, and you're reverting to immaturity like "DERP, WHAT A TYPICAL ATHEIST," and changing my username from "Can you justify that" to "Can I justify that." Really, how immature of you. How old are you all? Age your god damn age. Ridiculing me by changing my posts, my name, and to say my location is "worshiping monkies," REALLY? Grow up. Every one of you. None of you can actually give me a head-to-head argument about why they think I'm wrong.

Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory, and try to prove it wrong.

Another epic fail!

You threw down the glove of the Gauntlet of Challenge® and failed at your own challenge. I analyzed your impeccable logic and post it below:

Originally Posted by Can I justify that

Science most certainly does not.....Theories are all I have........There's no way to prove it.........Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory............

You sure missed the mark!


By the way, I made no such edits to your account. It is not possible for me to do so. I am offended by your unfounded accusations. Though not surprised, based on all the other lies and back pedaling you do.

[Phebe Carlyle]

One of the most debauched things this horrible person has written is that the only way he will believe the world is flat, is if he sees pictures of people falling off!

Doesn't he realize that people falling off would be the proof he needs to show the earth is a sphere?

Brothers and Sisters, it's obvious we are dealing with a looney-toon here!

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Lycia The Repentant

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

I'm sorry to say this, but you're wrong. I know you're just a girl and cannot understand, but let me try and lay it out for you: Atheists worship monkeys and Charles Darwin.

[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by Lycia The Repentant

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

I was in the Zoo recently to see if monkeys can evolve into humans, which they didn't of course. These monkeys didn't seem like they would understand any explanation at all. I think hunting them down and killing them is the only thing they can be used for, although the Zoo keeper didn't seem to agree with me on that after I shot a few of them.

[Brother Barnabus]

!. If we're wrong (which we're not) then we're just worm food when we die.
2. If you're wrong then you burn in hell forever with Satan corn-holing you with his spiny member FOREVER.

Go ahead and roll those dice Skippy.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Lycia The Repentant

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

If you weren't so blind, maybe you could be seeing what I had to say about this whole Atheism equalling a religion.

None of this is important anyway, what's the point of arguing over it? Take a real argument I laid out and prove THAT wrong. This has nothing to do with anything.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Lisa H

You idea of atheism is really misguided. You do not know what you are talking about. Whenever someone proves you wrong you have to make a derogatory remark. You made derogatory remark towards me by saying I am 12. Yet when someone says to you to act your age you complain it's off topic. You cannot have it both ways. So just admit you have been proven wrong and God exists.

-I know exactly what I'm talking about, you are all just too stubborn to see my point of view and just revert to "Silly boy! God is reality!!! " and don't actually try to prove me wrong. Then you get other people to back up your worthless argument, saying "Oh you can't understand the bible because Satan is your father" or, "You're so naive, God most obviously created the universe."

-No one has proved me wrong yet, I made a derogatory remark because you do not understand any type of point I have been making about this, and you haven't even tried to. Like this. I wouldn't be having to explain all of this if you understood at all.

-No one has told me to act my age, they asked my age. Learn to read, really? That's not derogatory, that's pure worriedness from me to you since it's blatant that you can't understand context. I said it's irrelevant because what I said to him was rhetorical, and I wasn't purely asking his age.

-I have not been proven wrong. None of the points I've made have been proven wrong. The most I've been "proven wrong" ( if you didn't get it), is by you saying "OH THE BIBLE IS RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG THE BIBLE IS UTTER PROOF" though it could have been easily written without Jesus or God ever existing. It really could've.

[James Hutchins]

But you have supplied ZERO proof. When you threw down the glove for the Gauntlet of Challenge®, you crumbled like a six month old cookie. Crying like a little girl, spouting nonsensical theories and suppositions. Not a single proven fact has ever been supplied by you. You just want everyone else to provide you with a free lunch. It is leeches like you that have caused the global economic meltdown.

[Moogitar (On Moderation)]

I find this site outrageous, because everything is biased to make your religion sound better. You also make it seem heterosexual American Caucasian Christian people who speak proper American English "As Jesus demands" (which I've never seen Jesus say, because American English wasn't known at that time) is superior to any other religion. Also, based on your people's logic, if it's written in the bible, it must be true. Well, here's a bit from the Atheist bible; Genesis 1:1; The world was created by the big bang, and life was made by the theory of evolution until otherwise proved different by science. Based on your logic, that would be true. But since it's a bible not from your religion, you're going to say it's wrong, and you will say something like "May Jesus save your soul...". Let me tell you this; I don't need a bible to tell me that's true, because science has put everything together, and it works. Sure you can say it's only a theory, but god is a way more unlikely to happen theory. There is no superior "god" that controls everything. Just because genesis 1:1 states that god made the earth, doesn't mean he exists, or it's even true. I'm not sure why I'm even posting this, because you people are too much blinded by your religion to see that even as a Christian, you're still doing things that "Jesus" and "God" would disapprove of, let alone that the logic being pointed out to you makes much more sense than the existence of God or Jesus.
<-- That didn't happen, because it's not real.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by James Hutchins

Another epic fail!

You threw down the glove of the Gauntlet of Challenge® and failed at your own challenge. I analyzed your impeccable logic and post it below:


You sure missed the mark!


By the way, I made no such edits to your account. It is not possible for me to do so. I am offended by your unfounded accusations. Though not surprised, based on all the other lies and back pedaling you do.

I "failed" the challenge because I didn't admit that God is real? Nice going.

By the way, I didn't directly say that YOU changed it. I was commenting to whoever since, since obviously I don't know who did it. Lies and back pedaling? That's your opinion.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by James Hutchins

But you have supplied ZERO proof. When you threw down the glove for the Gauntlet of Challenge®, you crumbled like a six month old cookie. Crying like a little girl, spouting nonsensical theories and suppositions. Not a single proven fact has ever been supplied by you. You just want everyone else to provide you with a free lunch. It is leeches like you that have caused the global economic meltdown.

I did not "crumble like a six month old cookie," I displayed my theories and you simply ignored them because they were theories.

Nonsensical? Do you not believe in planets and your own Bible? Are you just too naive to understand what I've been saying?

Free lunch? No. I'm trying to have a mature, adult debate, while all you do is ridicule me. I love your "God exists because the Bible says so, but we're too scared to look at any other possibility" attitude, because it's not getting you anywhere with this. I've seen stats, and cities with less Christians are much happier. There's been surveys. Also, here, I'll return your immaturity:



There were are, it's about even.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Phebe Dewitt

One of the most debauched things this horrible person has written is that the only way he will believe the world is flat, is if he sees pictures of people falling off!

Doesn't he realize that people falling off would be the proof he needs to show the earth is a sphere?

Brothers and Sisters, it's obvious we are dealing with a looney-toon here!

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

I can show the Earth is a sphere from pictures from outer space, which you foolishly do not believe in. What about airplanes, then. You're saying it'd curve with intelligent pushing/pulling, and you would skim across the edge of the Earth? People would be able to see that out their windows, while they don't.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

I'm sorry to say this, but you're wrong. I know you're just a girl and cannot understand, but let me try and lay it out for you: Atheists worship monkeys and Charles Darwin.

You're really funny. Half of us probably don't even know who Charles Darwin is. I don't. And monkeys? Please tell me you're joking. How immature.

At least we're not this naive.



Nice going.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

I was in the Zoo recently to see if monkeys can evolve into humans, which they didn't of course. These monkeys didn't seem like they would understand any explanation at all. I think hunting them down and killing them is the only thing they can be used for, although the Zoo keeper didn't seem to agree with me on that after I shot a few of them.

If evolution is nonsense like you say, explain rabbits having white fur in the winter and brown in the summer, to keep away from predators? How can rabbits do that if there's no such thing as evolution? And you never see the Bible talking about Dinosaurs either, we've dug up their BONES AND SKULLS. Have you ever dug up Jesus' tomb? No, I didn't think so. So why would God keep quiet about them? Because he didn't exist, nor does he today.

[Moogitar (On Moderation)]

Originally Posted by Can I justify that

You're really funny. Half of us probably don't even know who Charles Darwin is. I don't. And monkeys? Please tell me you're joking. How immature.

At least we're not this naive.



Nice going.

I completely agree with this person. You people are being immature by making us out to be "monkey worshipers". Your religion is so biased and illogical, I think it's too late to help you people now. You think the earth is flat because you can get high up in the air, and it's only flat land you see. Well, humans cannot see forever due to air conditions, and circles are made up of very small, straight lines, that change at angles to make a round circle, and that's how the earth is. The earth is big enough that those "small straight lines" are a lot bigger, and the land appears to be flat. Sure you could walk all the way around the world, and it's seem flat all the way across (ignoring mountains and hills), but the straight chunks are too long for you to notice any curvature in the earth. You people expect to see it to curve so noticeably, that the earth would have to be incredibly small to actually maintain it's circular shape.

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Brother Barnabus

!. If we're wrong (which we're not) then we're just worm food when we die.
2. If you're wrong then you burn in hell forever with Satan corn-holing you with his spiny member FOREVER.

Go ahead and roll those dice Skippy.

1. That's correct.
2. Yep.

Was there a point in that post, Brother Beelzebub?

[Can I justify that]

Originally Posted by Moogitar

I completely agree with this person. You people are being immature by making us out to be "monkey worshipers". Your religion is so biased and illogical, I think it's too late to help you people now. You think the earth is flat because you can get high up in the air, and it's only flat land you see. Well, humans cannot see forever due to air conditions, and circles are made up of very small, straight lines, that change at angles to make a round circle, and that's how the earth is. The earth is big enough that those "small straight lines" are a lot bigger, and the land appears to be flat. Sure you could walk all the way around the world, and it's seem flat all the way across (ignoring mountains and hills), but the straight chunks are too long for you to notice any curvature in the earth. You people expect to see it to curve so noticeably, that the earth would have to be incredibly small to actually maintain it's circular shape.

This man is correct. You know how a circle is made, correct? Draw a circle, then a bigger circle over it. Draw straight lines from the smaller to the bigger circle, you'll notice that if you draw enough lines, you'll be coloring in the circle. This is proof that a circle is made up of an infinite amount of lines. Now there should be no religious argument about this; Based on all the countries and how much water and landmass there is, we can agree the Earth is HUGE, right? You have to get out of the atmosphere before you can see the Earth. The reason the Earth LOOKS flat is because of how HUGE it is. If you're out of the atmosphere, you can't see some islands on a lake or something, which can be about 200x the size of a 5'5ft tall person. So if you can't even see those islands, then the person obviously won't be able to see that the Earth is a sphere. There's hills, trees, clouds, air conditions, like Moogitar said. If you stand on a mountain, other mountains or clouds or trees in the horizon are going to block you being able to see the Earth being a sphere. If you had a point to stand on about 50,000 feet and the Earth was COMPLETELY bare, there was just grass all over the Earth, small grass by grass nonetheless, and nothing else besides what you're standing on, you would be able to see the Earth is a sphere. It curves. Also, explain magnets if you don't believe in gravity.