[DolliMoans]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

have you tried 7 12 10 19 6 17 in the powerball

Are those the days when some of your infractions expire?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

How many here truly believe that that you will be saved ?

True Christians™ are already Saved® and free from sin, you silly boy!

1st John 1:7 "But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin."
Revelation 1:5 "And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood"
1st John 3:9 "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."

YIC

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by Thomas Taylor

Dear Mr. Grice,

Please do me the honor and enlighten me as to who the daughter of God is with a scriptural reference. I have just spent two days of my valuable time checking and rechecking and can find no direct correlation between your comment and the Holy Bible (KJV 1611).

YIC
TT

i cannot reveal her name for it would put her in danger however she is the seal and key to the end of it all.

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by Dr Laurence Niles

True Christians™ are already Saved® and free from sin, you silly boy!

1st John 1:7 "But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin."
Revelation 1:5 "And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood"
1st John 3:9 "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."

YIC

No you are not

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Romans 3:20Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.


And


Acts 4:12
Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Psalms 49:7-88.None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:
9.(For the redemption of their soul is precious, and it ceaseth for ever

[MitzaLizalor]

So, how's the intro. going? We've managed to get at least one checkable claim from Curtis. It turns out to be false and demonstrates that he has NOT actually read Revelation. Quickly to review:

Assuming that "rev." was Revelation, I read through. Beautifully though this future history describes God's love for us and records what Jesus has saved us from and even though many babies are involved, as I demonstrated, nothing in accordance with Grice's claim was apparent to me. I began to wonder if "rev." was some in other book?

When cooking I always use plain flour. If I want it to rise I use a squeeze of lemon + rising agent which fizzes with acid. By now I'm starting to suspect the Grice has taken some such mixture intracranially! Places that have always existed do not need to be created. I quoted the Scripture showing that Heaven was created, here it is again:

Revelation 10:5-6e And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are..

Heaven was created therefore Heaven has NOT always existed which tells us that our poster has NOT read Revelation. He has been asked repeatedly for evidence supporting his claim and responses, when forthcoming, are either completely irrelevant or refuted straight out the box. Dana summed it up quite well:

All the claims presented about this daughter are at variance with God's Word and what we can read right there in The Bible is denied outright! The conclusion is easy. Easy AND
obvious and explains what we all knew would happen Grice will not explain and cannot reveal her name NOT because it would put her in danger but because no such daughter exists. There are women, in Revelation associated with specific clothing styles, mentioned throughout The Bible who either follow God or who reject Him. What clothing styles would this C. Edward G. prefer? Blue? Green? Yellow? I think they'd be combined into a harlequin pattern popular in the middle ages. The rest of us have moved on.

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

So, how's the intro. going? We've managed to get at least one checkable claim from Curtis. It turns out to be false and demonstrates that he has NOT actually read Revelation. Quickly to review:Assuming that "rev." was Revelation, I read through. Beautifully though this future history describes God's love for us and records what Jesus has saved us from and even though many babies are involved, as I demonstrated, nothing in accordance with Grice's claim was apparent to me. I began to wonder if "rev." was some in other book?When cooking I always use plain flour. If I want it to rise I use a squeeze of lemon + rising agent which fizzes with acid. By now I'm starting to suspect the Grice has taken some such mixture intracranially! Places that have always existed do not need to be created. I quoted the Scripture showing that Heaven was created, here it is again:

Revelation 10:5-6e And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are..

Heaven was created therefore Heaven has NOT always existed which tells us that our poster has NOT read Revelation. He has been asked repeatedly for evidence supporting his claim and responses, when forthcoming, are either completely irrelevant or refuted straight out the box. Dana summed it up quite well:All the claims presented about this daughter are at variance with God's Word and what we can read right there in The Bible is denied outright! The conclusion is easy. Easy AND
obvious and explains what we all knew would happen Grice will not explain and cannot reveal her name NOT because it would put her in danger but because no such daughter exists. There are women, in Revelation associated with specific clothing styles, mentioned throughout The Bible who either follow God or who reject Him. What clothing styles would this C. Edward G. prefer? Blue? Green? Yellow? I think they'd be combined into a harlequin pattern popular in the middle ages. The rest of us have moved on.

The way you follow the Bible is an abomination ttothe creator it was written by men not God its their account for events that happened only the quoted text of Jesus is Godly and the Daughter of God is Jesus reborn female to prepare for the end do not mock me again mortal woman

[Harsha Shah]

Originally Posted by Thomas Taylor

My Dear Miss Shah,

Offending me is nigh on impossible and any and all offence given will be taken with a pinch of salt. As we are instructed by God in His Book of James I attempt to be slow to anger in all things.

James 1:19

“Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:”


By attempting to offend and reproach me for my attempts to show people that there is a life outside the dreary existance of non belief all you are doing is allowing me to bask in the Glory That God shines upon us. Thank you for granting me this.


1 Peter 4:14
If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy [are ye]; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you: on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glorified.


Now that I have shown you how utterly unoffended I am let me get on to the body of your extremely long and somehow demanding missive.

You have told me I am a bully for attempting to show people a different way of life in Jesus. This is quite untrue. All I am doing is informing them is what is written, plain as day, by God in the Holy Bible (KJV 1611). Take Mr. Grice for example. I have not bullied him at all. God does not approve of bullying:

2 Corinthians 12:10
Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.

I have not tried to shove my belief down his throat like he has with us. In his early posts I responded to him in a quite gentlemanly manner and received nothing but aggression and insult in his replies. Many others here have received the same treatment from him for attempting to show him just how slippery a slope he is on.

As for debating with your students, I will politely decline your kind offer. Whilst being an educator is always foremost in my thoughts I would hate for my ministrations to be taken in the wrong light. I know what Scottish brats are like.

You ask my concerns about Scottish Independence. I have one question in this regard. Where is the income required in the generation of an economy going to come from? You can't rely on golf courses forever.

Let me pose my "Corbynista" question more succinctly.

Are you an adherent of The Right Honorable Jeremy Corbyn and his henchwoman Dianne Abbot?

Do you support his party's fascist views with regards to semitism?

If you found the way in which this question was posed earlier, please accept my apologies. It was posed in line with mainstream press releases in the UK so I assumed you would not be offended.

Finally onto a certain Mr. James Joyce. Sadly I have to confess that I have never read any of his works as they are not of a Godly nature. In addition he was a sodomite which is frowned upon by the Lord God (you can read all about it in Leviticus 18:22). He was raised as a Catholic and the priests probably turned him this way.

Again, Miss Shah, I thank you for your kind, if somewhat unoffensive reply. Good luck seeing an elephant. If you want I have a few snaps I could send you.

YIC
TT
P.S. I am quite partial to trifle. Is it a sherry trifle or just plain?

Yes, Mr. Taylor. I am indeed seeing how you are now treating new posters on this forum in a more polite manner. Yes. You karma is going down, and while it is probably not affecting the non-likely afterlife, it is making life nicer on earth. Yes. I am very happy for you. Mr. Taylor. I am seeing how ahimsa is having its effect on you. Yes.

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Rev.8 in full pay close attention to And the angel took the censer, and filled it with fire of the altar, and cast it into the earth: and there were voices, and thunderings, and lightnings, and an earthquake

[Thomas Taylor]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

The way you follow the Bible is an abomination ttothe creator it was written by men not God its their account for events that happened only the quoted text of Jesus is Godly and the Daughter of God is Jesus reborn female to prepare for the end do not mock me again mortal woman

Dear Mr. Grice,


What do you mean? Are you trying to tell us that a group of people got together one Saturday afternoon at the pub and decided to write a book and call it The Holy Bible? You are more addled than I thought.


God has given us the Word directly. How can you deny the truth when it hits you straight in the face?


John 1:1
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”



There are many, many more places where this fact is stated. If you actually read the Bible you would be able to find these places for yourself instead of having to be corrected by the True Christian men and women of Landover.


2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:



Still waiting to know who this daughter of God is with a scriptural reference.


YIC
TT

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

The way you follow the Bible is an abomination ttothe creator it was written by men not God its their account for events that happened only the quoted text of Jesus is Godly

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

Rev.8 in full pay close attention to And the angel took the censer, and filled it with fire of the altar, and cast it into the earth: and there were voices, and thunderings, and lightnings, and an earthquake

That is just verse five. But how come if only the words of Jesus are valid you are quoting another source as authoritative? I've highlighted that part of your post in case you'd forgotten. God had a son, not a daughter. Perhaps you're confusing Jesus with the Meccan goddess cults? Even by heretics these have been rejected. Or are you saying that Mary was Jesus’ daughter and that you are she? Because the idol worshipped as “Mary” is no different from those others whatever names are attributed over the centuries. Satan is that Mary.

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by Thomas Taylor

Dear Mr. Grice,


What do you mean? Are you trying to tell us that a group of people got together one Saturday afternoon at the pub and decided to write a book and call it The Holy Bible? You are more addled than I thought.


God has given us the Word directly. How can you deny the truth when it hits you straight in the face?


John 1:1
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”



There are many, many more places where this fact is stated. If you actually read the Bible you would be able to find these places for yourself instead of having to be corrected by the True Christian men and women of Landover.


2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:



Still waiting to know who this daughter of God is with a scriptural reference.


YIC
TT

Cant give her name and no they wrote their account of events

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

i cannot reveal her name for it would put her in danger however she is the seal and key to the end of it all.

What you have done is confuse your life with a loose interpretation of the film ‘The Terminator’.

Do you see, now?

YIC

[Thomas Taylor]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

Cant give her name and no they wrote their account of events

Dear Mr. Grice,


Why are you being so antagonistic? No one here has done anything to warrant your brusque and brash behavior. I did not ask you for a name, only a scriptural reference.


You seem very mixed up in your take on the Bible (KJV 1611) and your responses are getting to be more desperate. When clutching at straws you need to be more insightful and show a deeper understanding of the subject matter under discussion.


In order for us to move forward at this point it is essential that you provide scriptural reference to this so called Daughter of God.


YIC
TT

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

That is just verse five. But how come if only the words of Jesus are valid you are quoting another source as authoritative? I've highlighted that part of your post in case you'd forgotten. God had a son, not a daughter. Perhaps you're confusing Jesus with the Meccan goddess cults? Even by heretics these have been rejected. Or are you saying that Mary was Jesus’ daughter and that you are she? Because the idol worshipped as “Mary” is no different from those others whatever names are attributed over the centuries. Satan is that Mary.

NO!!! Events have changed dont you people understand im trying to save you the Bible is only half valid you seem to forget in the old testament he said dont add to or take away from the Bible suddenly some Guy shows up saying hes Gods son (but secretly God) no sorry the God you describe would never come here to die for us hes does not care however his offspring does his daughter loves this world and knows soon it must end

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

Cant give her name and no they wrote their account of events

If “no they wrote their account of events” means what it appears to mean, why are you quoting written accounts of different events from a different source?



One would not seek to authenticate events in Enid Blyton's Adventures of the Wishing Chair by reading Dante Alighieri.



Or perhaps you would?

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

If “no they wrote their account of events” means what it appears to mean, why are you quoting written accounts of different events from a different source?



One would not seek to authenticate events in Enid Blyton's Adventures of the Wishing Chair by reading Dante Alighieri.



Or perhaps you would?

never heard of either of these sorry i dont spend much time with mortal things

[curtisedwardgrice (Quarantined)]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

If “no they wrote their account of events” means what it appears to mean, why are you quoting written accounts of different events from a different source?



One would not seek to authenticate events in Enid Blyton's Adventures of the Wishing Chair by reading Dante Alighieri.



Or perhaps you would?

Dante Alighieri man whe described hell in great detail

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by curtisedwardgrice

Dante Alighieri man whe described hell in great detail

He described his own ideas but, being a Florentine papist, knew nothing about The Bible. There is a tome of heresy masquerading as a Bible among Romish blasphemers but it somehow enables them to pray for dead people, even pray to dead people, for which purpose they invented purgatory and limbo. Blyton invented the Snoogle. Neither will get anyone to Heaven!