Satan's Entertainment Discussion for Movies/TV/Music/Video Games/Pop Culture. How HELLY-wood is destroying our society and parents can learn to protect their children from sinful influences like Disney, Pacman, and Tic-Tac-Toe. |
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-11-2011, 06:17 PM
Nothing says " good old days" like one of Norman Rockwell's artworks painted for the cover of the Saturday Evening Post. Right? Wrong. Look between the brushstrokes and you'll see that Norman Rockwell was not a hero of all things white, Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant. He was a homosexuality-promoting, feminazism-inventing, Muslim pervert. In short, he was a typical artist.
First of all, we are talking about an artist. Anyone framiliar with the Da Vinci code knows how even the most respected artists like to sneak pagan subliminal messages into their works. I don't know if it comes from the paint fumes or what, or maybe because art critics are all jew-liberals, but all successful artists are working for Satan in one way or another.
Saturday Evening Post. The name sounds innocent, until you think about who will stay up Saturday night reading. Obviously not someone planning to go to church the next morning. Or at least on being alert and fully awake in the house of the LORD.
The Evidence:
Triumph in Defeat
At first, this looks like an innocent picture. A girl is sitting in the principal's office, with black eyes and other evidence of a beating. At first glance, it looks like the principal has beated the Love of Jesus into her, and sheËs smiling because she now knows Jesus. Yet the title suggests she has suffered the injuries in a fight, and is now in trouble for it.
Everybody knows that girls are getting more violent these days, and feminism is to blame. Pink-pistol-packing lesbian gangs have been exposed by Bill O'Rielly, in just one example. Obviously in the good old days girls did not punch each other in the eye, and even if they did, they would not smile triumphantly as they remember the damage they dished out in return. No, in the good old days girls were delicate flowers, sugar and spice and everything nice. So, the artist was obviously being creative. In short, he invented the violent girl phenomenom before the feminists had even dreamed of it. He probably gave them the idea!
The Soda Jerk
In this picture we see a teenage boy, working the counter at a diner, who seems to be getting very friendly with three teenage girls. I don't know if he gave them free milkshakes (which would be theft from his employer), or if he's just a casanova. Either way, this view of the foreplay to a reverse-gangbang is obscene. And why three girls. Why not two, or four? Obviously this is a reference to Islam, which allows three wives. Also, one of the three girls is facing away from the viewer, with her bottom pointed at us. Clearly she represents his greek wife, if you catch my drift. She might not be the only one: all of the girls are bent over obscenely, though. And drinking milkshakes, creamy white goo....Not so innocent on second glance.
Home From Camp
Kids called them tomboys, but adults always knew what they were: baby bulldykes. Here we see a bulldyke returning from summer camp. She has a snake in a jar (a phallic symbol, and a reference to the origional sin of Eve). She has collected some very ordinary-looking plants. Probably for use as drugs. What else are plain-looking plants collected for?
Tackled
This one explains itself. Disgusting! And they get worse: there's one of a boy in a doctor's office, with a bent-over little boy's bum-cleavage showing....I have not put it here for reasons of both decency and legality.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
Last edited by Jeb Stuart Thurmond; 07-12-2011 at 06:25 PM.
|
|
Petite pearl of Baptist womanhood
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,686
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Woodlawn Drive, Freehold, USA USA USA
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-11-2011, 07:18 PM
Thank you thank you Thank you, Brother Thurmond, for bringing forth a topic too long ignored: The Perverted and Disgusting Works of Sick-ular Artist, Norman Rockwell.
This portrait of a sissyboy has always sickened me deeply. After dipping into Mommy's makeup case and Sister's lingerie drawer, the impish little deviant is now wondering if he'll ever be a real woman, like the movie star he idolizes in the magazine.
It is well known that Rockwell used his neighbors as models for his "art". The model for this piece of pederastic porno was a starstruck Vermont youngster named Scutters McCoy...he ran errands for the Rockwell Family, and eventually disappeared.
Coincidence?
|
|
Senior Pastor Ex-liberal; converted to True Christianity™ Always Biblically correct
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 10,667
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 13706 Levite's Sojourn Terr., Gibeah Hill, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-11-2011, 07:35 PM
His work also promoted harlotry among uppity females. Consider this example:
A stylishly dressed (see 1 Tim. 2:9) woman is driving alone in a convertible, rather than being driven by her husband or father or at most driving an SUV full of the young soldiers for Christ to whom she has given birth. She also seems unconcerned that she is causing the two men in the truck to commit adultery in their hearts with her.
This church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.
Questions to ask liberal "Christians" ✞ Things that the Bible doesn't say ✞ Tolerance
|
|
Petite pearl of Baptist womanhood
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,686
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Woodlawn Drive, Freehold, USA USA USA
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-11-2011, 07:44 PM
She is also brazenly ignoring the male drivers on the road, who may well be trying to warn her she's headed down a 1-way street...
This is how tragedy happens.
|
|
Petite pearl of Baptist womanhood
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,686
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Woodlawn Drive, Freehold, USA USA USA
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-11-2011, 08:22 PM
This is another Rockwell portrait that depraved neighborhood sissyboy Scutters McCoy posed for before disappearing.
Here he is at the local train station, hoping to entice battle fatigued GI's returning from WWII with bad eyesight.
He has again dressed in his sister's clothes, and is using the old homosexual trick of holding a glamorous woman's picture in front of his face, like a mask.
.
|
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-12-2011, 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb Thurmond
The Soda Jerk
this view of the foreplay to a reverse-gangbang is obscene. And why three girls. Why not two, or four? Obviously this is a reference to Islam, which allows three wives. Also, one of the three girls is facing away from the viewer, with her bottom pointed at us. Clearly she represents his greek wife, if you catch my drift. She might not be the only one: all of the girls are bent over obscenely...
|
I can't beleive I didn't see it the first time - did you? There's another well-hidden homosexual message in there. Look to the far left (Yes, I know the whole painting is far left politically, but I mean the far left side of the painting.)
Do you see it now? A voyeur! Yes, Muslims are allowed to have 3 wives, and as for a male lover or two on the side, in the Islamic world that's just taken for granted. (When Muslims stone a gay man, they aren't stoning him for having gay sex, they're stoning him for not being bisexual like everyone else over there). Just look at the way he shying sucks away at the creamy white goo....Just waiting until everybody's so hot and bothered they won't notice or care if he joins in on the action....
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
|
|
Petite pearl of Baptist womanhood
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,686
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Woodlawn Drive, Freehold, USA USA USA
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
07-12-2011, 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb Thurmond
Do you see it now? A voyeur!
|
Also, the promise of beastiality!
Look how the innocent little pup has been hoisted up on a stool, so he can "join" in the "fun". They've even put a collar (a common sadomasochistic prop) on him so he can't escape.
Normal people don't have their dogs positioned on chairs behind them! (Dear God™, but it makes me ill to look at all this! This sort of smut was once smeared across magazine covers across America. Now this thread needs an 18-and-over warning...)
.
|
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Re: Norman Rockwell: homo-promo pervert, man-hater, muslim! -
09-26-2011, 03:29 AM
Just as a reminder of why NO artist can ever be trusted.... Remember the Faithmouse meltdown.
I think the cartoon has always been explicit; I just kept the sexual innuendoes buried because I was hoping to see Faithmouse syndicated one day. Now that I realize that won't happen it doesn't matter.
All the characters have sexual motivation, which I think is honest. If you consider the issues of greatest concern to Christian conservatives and Catholics, you come right up to the fact that sex is at the heart of all of these issues, and then the conversation can't proceed further.
NO "ARTIST" CAN BE TRUSTED. From now on, the only true art is motivational posters, and only the ones with eagles on them.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
|
Tags
|
1930s, 1940s, 1950's, 1960's, art, baby bulldyke, bill o'reilly is not a goon, brainwashing, bum cleavage, feminazi agenda, homosexual undertones, muslim monkey gods, norman rockwell, polygamy, saturday evening post, subliminal messages, tomboy |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|