Landover Baptist Lounge Relax, Kick your shoes off. Praise Jesus!!! (Blacks and Homosexuals strictly prohibited!) |
|
Gushing for Jesus
|
|
Posts: 23,743
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
"Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 04:28 AM
CNN is trying to explain, but I'm not sure I understand:
Quote:
In a decision released Wednesday, the office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that "these registrations must be canceled because they were disparaging to Native Americans."
|
CNN video
I don't understand. Indians have red skin. Why is that offensive? I don't mind being called a lady, because that's what I am. If someone says I have fair, flawless skin, I don't cry and try to sue them. Because it's true. Just like Indians and their red skin.
Can someone please explain?
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.
|
|
Pastor of Hermeneutics and Apologetics Bathed in Christ's Precious Blood Apostle to the Cactuses, Tumbleweeds and Jackrabbits
|
|
Posts: 14,178
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: With my nose stuck in the Bible.
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 05:33 AM
I don't get it, sister. In our world, we call a spade a spade.
It don't know why they dance around the issue.
Just look at this redskin all ready to rape and pillage.
Christians are superior because we possess an understanding that unbelievers lack. It is through the Power of Jesus only the converted mind is able to understand what is going on in the world; what the Communists are really up to; what Satan's intentions are. Most unbelievers do not even believe in Satan and cannot understand his tactics.
|
True Christian™ with a quiverful
|
|
Posts: 2,243
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: In the kitchen
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 09:33 AM
How is anyone meant to distinguish between dot injuns and redskin injuns then?
They might have to rename them the Washington Injuns, but then all the turbanheads will think it's their team.
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 213
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bozeman, MT
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 04:00 PM
This is clearly the work of insidious liberals who never rest at trying to undermine every great American institution.
I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays. As for me, I'll continue to root for my beloved Patriots, who have the most Godly name in football. (Not the Saints, who are named after cathylick idols.)
Proverbs 27:15 A continual dropping in a very rainy day and a contentious woman are alike.
|
|
Gushing for Jesus
|
|
Posts: 23,743
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi Jones
I
Just look at this redskin all ready to rape and pillage.
|
That's just the thing, Brother. You'd think a savage race like the red indians would appreciate some positive attention, you know?
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 1,941
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: With Jesus
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 05:20 PM
So what are they supposed to call themselves? The Washington Native Americans? Because that term discriminates against all other Americans, by which I mean Real Americans, good folk who were born in the USA and are therefore "native" to the country.
This is just disgusting and there should be an international protest.
2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
|
|
Landover Security Superviser Asset Loss Prevention and Personal Security Expert NOT angry and positively NOT Gay
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 18,554
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold Iowa
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 07:23 PM
Rep Steven King has the explain Sister
https://twitter.com/SteveKingIA
Quote:
Obama raids Redskins by weaponizing USPTO. Cancels Redskins logo! Free people will not tolerate a Kim Jong POTUS.
|
Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.
Hot Must ReadThreads!
Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!
|
|
Warning: In case of Rapture, this account will be unmanned.
|
|
Posts: 7,220
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-19-2014, 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attila's Wife
So what are they supposed to call themselves? The Washington Native Americans? Because that term discriminates against all other Americans, by which I mean Real Americans, good folk who were born in the USA and are therefore "native" to the country.
|
THIS^^^^
What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)? I know the beaners jump the border, so they're from Mexico. They call themselves Indians but I've yet to see a dothead flail around with dead birds on their heads.
Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air! I think it's shameful we honor them with an AMERICAN football team (when we have no idea where they originated) and they stab us right in the back.
Who is next? The White Sox, for being racist?
|
|
Mayor of Freehold
|
|
Posts: 12,172
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: City Hall, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 02:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Creeser
THIS^^^^
What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)?
Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air!
|
I've wondered for years where they came from. They are always complaining about their treatment here. If they had just stayed in whatever country they are from they wouldn't have these problems.
Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.
|
True Christian™ with a quiverful
|
|
Posts: 2,243
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: In the kitchen
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 03:30 AM
Didn't they come from Canuckistan?
|
|
Deaconess Gracious, genteel, kind, tender, and warm True Christian™ Sister
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 15,215
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: God's Own America
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Creeser
THIS^^^^
What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)? I know the beaners jump the border, so they're from Mexico. They call themselves Indians but I've yet to see a dothead flail around with dead birds on their heads.
Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air! I think it's shameful we honor them with an AMERICAN football team (when we have no idea where they originated) and they stab us right in the back.
Who is next? The White Sox, for being racist?
|
They must be a kind of dot-head and obviously either swam or came over in boats while our founding fathers weren't looking so they could try and pre-steal America.
God gave white folk this country for a reason.
Sister Talitha
Markswoman, Circumcisionist, Platinum Tither.
HE took the damsel by the hand, and said unto her, Talitha Cumi; which is,
being interpreted, Damsel, I say unto thee, arise!...Mark 5:41
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 1,941
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: With Jesus
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talitha
They must be a kind of dot-head and obviously either swam or came over in boats while our founding fathers weren't looking so they could try and pre-steal America.
God gave white folk this country for a reason.
|
Can they swim, sister? I thought they were allergic to water - both to getting it on their skin and to drinking it.
2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
|
True Christian™ with a quiverful
|
|
Posts: 2,243
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: In the kitchen
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attila's Wife
Can they swim, sister? I thought they were allergic to water - both to getting it on their skin and to drinking it.
|
They're not English, you know.
|
|
Trying to out-Methuselah Methuselah You kids get off his lawn!
|
|
Posts: 22,438
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Close to God
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 11:17 AM
I never understand all these red, yellow and black people complaining about racism all the time. If they took regular baths and had jobs they would look just like decent white Republican Christians.
Freedom means voting for Donald Trump!
To most "Christians" The Bible is like a license agreement. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree". All those "Christians" will burn in Hell!
James 2:10 "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 708
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pajala, Sweden
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 12:09 PM
I've always thought they are immigrants from India. Is it not so? Or Russia. They look a little bit like Sami People.
|
|
Senior Pastor Ex-liberal; converted to True Christianity™ Always Biblically correct
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 10,667
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 13706 Levite's Sojourn Terr., Gibeah Hill, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Van Slyke
I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays.
|
They might as well. Both the city whose name they bear and the state in which their stadium is actually located are hotbeds of fag-enabling.
This church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.
Questions to ask liberal "Christians" ✞ Things that the Bible doesn't say ✞ Tolerance
|
|
Tin Tither
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 234
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: pastors garage
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Van Slyke
This is clearly the work of insidious liberals who never rest at trying to undermine every great American institution.
I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays. As for me, I'll continue to root for my beloved Patriots, who have the most Godly name in football. (Not the Saints, who are named after cathylick idols.)
|
It wouldnt' suprise me neither we cant' hurt the feelings of the injins and we have to give special consderation to queers its' all about every one accept us straight white Christian males its' perfectly okay to persectue us.
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 7
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Arlington, WA
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 10:15 PM
I for one am offended by the name Redskins! Why should we have our Godly team named after a bunch of savages who open their Hedonistic church that they call casinos. The worship money above all else and are no better than the Jews in my honest opinion. Why should they have the privilege of having a major sports team named after them?
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,765
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry, Redding, CA
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-20-2014, 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Faith
I for one am offended by the name Redskins! Why should we have our Godly team named after a bunch of savages who open their Hedonistic church that they call casinos. The worship money above all else and are no better than the Jews in my honest opinion. Why should they have the privilege of having a major sports team named after them?
|
If they were honest, the team would be called the blackskins.
I still can't believe that the PTO gave them the trademark then revoked it. What a bunch of Indian givers!
Draft Freehold, Iowa Mayor
Johny Joe Hold
for Vice President in 2024
|
|
Serving Jesus
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 4,470
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Godly Texas, Besieged by Papist Idol Worshippers
|
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? -
06-21-2014, 12:19 AM
Those Induns have been pillaging honest Americans, selling them swamp land, stealing livestock and women, scalping White men and generally acting like the bloodthirsty savages they are since the day we arrived to bring them Christian civilization. I cannot for the life of me understand how it is possible to disparage a godless savage by calling him a redskin.
Is not their skin red?
I believe it would be better to go among them and finish our Christian duty than to listen to them complain. We started out just fine; there's hardly an Indun left on the East Coast, but as we moved west, we became backsliders and they multiplied.
Now, they have more casinos than the Mafia. Those who do not worship pagan idols are Jehovah's Witnesses. They are mostly drunk most of the time.
This complaining about being redskins is an abomination and something should be done about it.
God judgeth the righteous, And God is angry with the wicked every day- Psalm 7:11
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|