[Mary Etheldreda]

At the recent Colorado Convention Center, July 1-3 in Denver, CO, Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty fame threw down some definitive proof of Jesus' existence. I predict atheists, who demand tangible proof, will ignore the very evidence they have in their homes, and on their cell phones, and use to navigate all the events in all their days. They will because they have to. To accept the proof would be to admit intellectual and spiritual defeat, and they're too invested in sin to do such a thing, courageous and salvific as it may be.

Originally Posted by True Christian™ Phil Robertson

He did come, and every last one of you seated in here, and the rest of America, and most of the world, their calendar documents it. It is two thousand and sixteen years since Jesus showed up. Right?

So don't tell me He wasn't here!

By the way, if your calendar is dated on, of all the human beings who have ever walked on the earth, and your calendar is dedicated and predicated to just one of 'em? Evidently, something rather large went down back then!

Your calendar documents it!

How come we say, "Uh, it's 2016 years and I don't believe in this Jesus stuff."

And I said, "Well you're counting time by Him, dude."

Face it!

So Atheists, why don't your calendars say it's July, the year 4.5 billion?

Watch it here: http://dai.ly/x4jkxh5

[Nobar King]

How can you lose that argument? Our entire calendar system is based on the life of someone who never even existed? C'mon!

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

He makes a great point. The world's calendars all begin 359 days before the birth of our One True Savior. Not on the day itself, as you might think if you were a naive fool, but before it by a few hundred days. We can only glaze over in wonder at the incomprehensibility of His Grand Plan to our feeble minds. Praise Jesus!

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

I've never quite trusted Phil Robertson (he looks a little too much like one of those mooselimb ayatollahs), but he does have a point. If these secular atheist scientists are to be believed, this duck guy is off by a few billion years. According to the Bible (KJV1611), God created everything in 7 days - that means the earth, heavens, firmament, - the whole enchilada.

How Old is the Universe?
By Nola Taylor Redd, SPACE.com Contributor | December 20, 2013 06:21pm ET

. . .
In 2012, WMAP estimated the age of the universe to be 13.772 billion years, with an uncertainty of 59 million years. In 2013, Planck measured the age of the universe at 13.82 billion years. Both of these fall within the lower limit of 11 billion years independently derived from the globular clusters, and both have smaller uncertainties than that number.

. . .
http://www.space.com/24054-how-old-is-the-universe.html

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Er, what?

In 2012, WMAP estimated the age of the universe to be 13.772 billion years, with an uncertainty of 59 million years. In 2013, Planck measured the age of the universe at 13.82 billion years. Both of these fall within the lower limit of 11 billion years independently derived from the globular clusters, and both have smaller uncertainties than that number.

In what alternative universe (see what I did there? ) do 13.772 billion and 13.82 billion "fall within" 11 billion?

They're just making stuff up, aren't they? And why even bother, when God wrote the Bible to give us all the answers?

[wtfisthissite]

It is not the year 4.5 billion due to the creation of man and the thought of time management, 4.5 billion years ago, man did not exist, but through evolution, we became smarter, more able to keep track of time and to measure time, hence why our calendars only date back 2016 years ago.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by wtfisthissite

It is not the year 4.5 billion due to the creation of man and the thought of time management, 4.5 billion years ago, man did not exist, but through evolution, we became smarter, more able to keep track of time and to measure time, hence why our calendars only date back 2016 years ago.

Dear friend:

Your explanation doesn't make sense. Even secular "evidence" shows that people have been able to keep track of time and to measure time for more than 2,016 years. Jesus wins again.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

It is just nonsense. If people couldn't keep track of time before Jesus was born, then how did His mother and stepfather know what day they had to travel to Bethlehem?

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey

It is just nonsense. If people couldn't keep track of time before Jesus was born, then how did His mother and stepfather know what day they had to travel to Bethlehem?

Precisely this. By starting the calendar some 300 hundred days before the event, mortals had ample time to learn the new rules and so everyone could be in the right place at the right time - December 25th.

[PetitionLady]

Originally Posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey

It is just nonsense. If people couldn't keep track of time before Jesus was born, then how did His mother and stepfather know what day they had to travel to Bethlehem?

Amen, Sister Joanna.

Due to Common Core ... 1+1 no longer equals 2 ... pffffft.

Thanks for your common sense. + =

[euphoric_neckbeard]

Why does it matter if Jesus existed or not? Even if he did, the Bible doesn't describe him with 100% accuracy, he wasn't the Son of God, he didn't perform miracles or raise from the dead. If he existed, then he's dead. Been dead for almost 2000 years. The Bible is just a bunch of stories that have no evidence to back up. Especially Noah's Ark, Creationism, Jesus's resurrection, etc. There are no outside sources that describe Jesus's resurrection or miracles.

Does people switching the calendar into a different direction when Jesus existed somehow prove your god?


Why do I have to say it's the year 4.5 billion just because I'm an atheist? I'll pick whichever way to tell the dates that I want. It's true that the earth is around 4.5 billion years old, but it makes things a lot easier for me to stick with the simple "it's 2016".

[euphoric_neckbeard]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

He makes a great point. The world's calendars all begin 359 days before the birth of our One True Savior. Not on the day itself, as you might think if you were a naive fool, but before it by a few hundred days. We can only glaze over in wonder at the incomprehensibility of His Grand Plan to our feeble minds. Praise Jesus!

Lol who the hell are you *** removed man-on-dog pornographic content ***

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Originally Posted by euphoric_neckbeard

Why does it matter if Jesus existed or not? Even if he did, the Bible doesn't describe him with 100% accuracy, he wasn't the Son of God, he didn't perform miracles or raise from the dead. If he existed, then he's dead. Been dead for almost 2000 years. The Bible is just a bunch of stories that have no evidence to back up. Especially Noah's Ark, Creationism, Jesus's resurrection, etc. There are no outside sources that describe Jesus's resurrection or miracles.

Does people switching the calendar into a different direction when Jesus existed somehow prove your god?


Why do I have to say it's the year 4.5 billion just because I'm an atheist? I'll pick whichever way to tell the dates that I want. It's true that the earth is around 4.5 billion years old, but it makes things a lot easier for me to stick with the simple "it's 2016".

I must say, you're worse than the mooselimbs, but at least they acknowledge the existence of Jesus - just that he wasn't the Son of God. Maybe you don't believe in God - but what about allah? Do you know how to drive trucks?

Or maybe you're some kind of troll sent here by one of George Soros' funded organizations (like MoveOn.org) to disrupt the election of Donald Trump.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Originally Posted by euphoric_neckbeard

Why does it matter if Jesus existed or not? Even if he did, the Bible doesn't describe him with 100% accuracy, he wasn't the Son of God, he didn't perform miracles or raise from the dead. If he existed, then he's dead. Been dead for almost 2000 years. The Bible is just a bunch of stories that have no evidence to back up. Especially Noah's Ark, Creationism, Jesus's resurrection, etc. There are no outside sources that describe Jesus's resurrection or miracles.

Not too ironic.

[euphoric_neckbeard]

Originally Posted by Pastor Isaac Peters

Not too ironic.

please elaborate


And yes I am atheist, I don't worship magical sky fairies so no

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by euphoric_neckbeard

...The Bible is just a bunch of stories that have no evidence to back up...

Originally Posted by Pastor Isaac Peters

Not too ironic.

Originally Posted by euphoric_neckbeard

please elaborate...

The Bible is evidence (go look up the definition of the word). Whether you personally accept that evidence or not is irrelevant.

[euphoric_neckbeard]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

The Bible is evidence (go look up the definition of the word). Whether you personally accept that evidence or not is irrelevant.

Yes, but the stories that are claimed by the Bible to be true such as Noah's Ark and Adam and Eve never happened, since there is no evidence and people wrote about it thousands of years later. Plus it wasn't divinely inspired, it was made up by a bunch of men with some sort of hallucination or delusion.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by euphoric_neckbeard

Yes, but the stories that are claimed by the Bible to be true such as Noah's Ark and Adam and Eve never happened, since there is no evidence...

*Yawn* Remember this?

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

The Bible is evidence (go look up the definition of the word). Whether you personally accept that evidence or not is irrelevant.

...Plus it wasn't divinely inspired, it was made up by a bunch of men with some sort of hallucination or delusion.

Nice claims. How about some proof? You wouldn't want to go convincing people of things that have no proof, right?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by wtfisthissite

It is not the year 4.5 billion due to the creation of man and the thought of time management, 4.5 billion years ago, man did not exist, but through evolution, we became smarter, more able to keep track of time and to measure time, hence why our calendars only date back 2016 years ago.

Nonsense.

Time was recorded longer ago than 2016 but at the time it was recorded as BC as in Before Christ.
As in the Exodus took place around 500 BC!

SMH

[refridgerator]

The chinese uses other calendar.

And in the good old days in the Soviet Union, another calendar was used too.

In both, Jesus is not mentioned at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_calendar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_calendar

Besides this refutation, the fact that a calendar is developed with Jesus born reference, it doesn't means that all what is told about him is truth.