[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by BlackCat13th

not exactly. saying that you have the clue no one else does in regard to what god hates is more than a little arrogant. furthermore, there's little indication as to what god hates or that god hates, what-so-ever.


is or can bdsm be disruptive? bdsm is for experts and untrained persons or dabbler hobbyists often get it wrong.


there is no valid argument against evolution. factually, it's the manor in which god created us if it be that god created us at all. "and so they came to be, according to their kind." plenty of people are still unaware that darwin wasn't an atheist.


but you're right in that there is good reason to be against bdsm communities. they're overrun by special interest groups that care nothing for objective truth and everything about power. they're overrun by posers and heroin dependent pederasts who give not a single witt for freedom of speech.


if you ask nicely, i'll tell you where you can still find a god (or something else) speaking to you. i do expect any questions to be asked in a manor and with the pretense that i actually do know and actually can tell you. you wont be happy with the answer but that's because it will seem fatuous. it will also seem underwhelming because while i can tell you where to look, i cant tell you what is being said. it seems to be for each person and each person alone but i haven't really checked that the same experience is shared between too persons or more. it has seemed to be, but i've not verified to my own satisfaction. after that i ask you not to tell anyone else but rather send them to me to ask me instead. it's not too much to ask for a little credit. and if you think you'd like me to tell you what i think god's name is, i think it should be obvious so far. first please guess what i'd say god's name is.


i'd think most of the valid condemnation for bdsm is from the standpoint that persons tend to sanctimoniously cling to subjectivity. bdsm is a subjective machination of objectivity. it's a confusion of impulses that are for pair bonding. you might notice a correlation to this perfectly valid condemnation of bdsm communities. and yes, i mean it.

Frankly, after all that, I don't know what the heck you mean.




And it's "manner", not "manor". Moreover, "too persons" should be written as "two persons."


Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.


I realize that anybody can make a typo, but is your shift key out of whack? Capitalization would make some of the bizarre blather you wrote more comprehensible.

[Alvin Moss]

Originally Posted by BlackCat13th

DRIVEL LARGELY REMOVED-----

there is no valid argument against evolution. factually, it's the manor in which god created us if it be that god created us at all.


there is good reason to be against bdsm communities. they're overrun by special interest groups that care nothing for objective truth and everything about power. they're overrun by posers and heroin dependent pederasts who give not a single witt for freedom of speech.

I don't mean to belittle your intellectual ability. I am certain that would be triggering, but I have a question and a comment. The question- Are you saying that the Lord created mankind while He was visiting a fine country house?


The comment- Your profile says you are 40 years old. God sends liars to Hell. What I see here is a pseudo intellectual attempt to seem relevant and intelligent. You are not 40 years old. You are a sophomore at...what? Swarthmore? Sarah Lawrence College? Don't they teach you girls how to spell anymore?

[RetardCat13th]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Frankly, after all that, I don't know what the heck you mean.




And it's "manner", not "manor". Moreover, "too persons" should be written as "two persons."


Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.


I realize that anybody can make a typo, but is your shift key out of whack? Capitalization would make some of the bizarre blather you wrote more comprehensible.

i wasn't expecting so many uptight pederasts. a couple of those errors i dont normaly make. probably edited in by the pederast mods you pederasts have here.

[RetardCat13th]

[QUOTE=handmaiden]Sheesh! You managed to spell "sanctimonious" correctly.[QUOTE]



you being sanctimonious about sanctimony, well that's just typical. guess i had that one right then?


[QUOTE]Sarah Lawrence College?[QUOTE]


is that where you failed to learn how to not be so obviously a pederast?

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by BlackCat13th

i wasn't expecting so many uptight pederasts. a couple of those errors i dont normaly make. probably edited in by the pederast mods you pederasts have here.

Dear, I am NOT a pederast. I am somewhat of a devotee of grammar pedagogy, I will admit.


I assure, those are not one in the same. . . Unlike Jesus who is God and the Son of God at the same time. And who loved us so much that He sent His only begotten Son, who was Himself, and existed as His Son before He was begotten on earth, to die on our behalf so that He could make us acceptable in His sight by the gift of His Blood, that He sacrificed to give to Himself on our behalf.

[RetardCat13th]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Dear, I am NOT a pederast. I am somewhat of a devotee of grammar pedagogy, I will admit.

no, you're the result of pederasty. its how <<<explicative deleted>>> reproduce. it's plain as day for all to see. nasty filthy thing that you are, completely up your own <<<explicative deleted>>>.


you're probably catholic.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by RetardCat13th

you're probably catholic.

You really are a retard, aren't you?



Baptist.

Not Catholic.

[Dotty too]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

You really are a retard, aren't you?



Baptist.

Not Catholic.

I always thought a Baptist was the person who poured water over your head during a baptism
Like it was a job in a church like a priest or choir singers

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

I always thought a Baptist was the person who poured water over your head during a baptism
Like it was a job in a church like a priest or choir singers

The level of your ignorance is quite impressive. Are you a product of one of the inner city public schools?

[Dotty too]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

The level of your ignorance is quite impressive. Are you a product of one of the inner city public schools?

How am I being ignorant? For not knowing that Baptists are a branch of Christians? Like I said I thought a Baptist was a job in church

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by RetardCat13th

no, you're the result of pederasty. its how <<<explicative deleted>>> reproduce. it's plain as day for all to see. nasty filthy thing that you are, completely up your own <<<explicative deleted>>>.


you're probably catholic.

Let's all take a deep breath and talk this through. I'm not comfortable discussing this subject, but I am not the result of pederasty. Not an expert, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.


I am neither nasty or filthy. I am actually quite tenderhearted and I bathe frequently and never entertain impure thoughts.


I used to be Catholic, but learned of its falsehoods and became a True Christian™. I now enjoy the True™ freedom of knowing that I am not going to hell, and I would like everyone to experience that sense of relief. That is why I am here.


I admit to being a little prissy regarding good grammar and clear writing. I am also very mindful about my manners, but sometimes it's not always easy to behave in a gracious manner to guests.


When they are rude and coarse and incomprehensible, it can be wearying. That's when I find it best to step back and pray.


The Bible speaks to us of turning the other cheek. But once I run out of cheeks and my behind starts to get red, I can become rather tart in my responses.


May God have mercy upon my soul.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

How am I being ignorant? For not knowing that Baptists are a branch of Christians?

Yes.

Originally Posted by dictionary

Ignorance : the state or fact of being ignorant : lack of knowledge, education, or awareness

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by RetardCat13th

no, you're the result of pederasty. its how <<<explicative deleted>>> reproduce. it's plain as day for all to see. nasty filthy thing that you are, completely up your own <<<explicative deleted>>>.you're probably catholic.

Still with the feeble, attempted insults?

There are two results from them: 1) proving to the True Christians™ that they're right:

2 Timothy 3:12 "Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution."

And 2) everyone else reading this is laughing at your fail.

Great job.

[Dotty too]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

Yes.

Well when you say it like that being ignorant doesn't sound like the terrible insult it's made out to be

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

Well when you say it like that being ignorant doesn't sound like the terrible insult it's made out to be

It's not too terrible because it's very easily curable by learning.

It gets worse, however, when a person decides to stay ignorant by choosing not to learn.

[I Man Rastafari]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

Well when you say it like that being ignorant doesn't sound like the terrible insult it's made out to be

Oh my goodness gracious! Do not worry about being called ignorant. I was also called ignorant when I first came to Babylon. I didn't know what a chicken nugget was and I didn't know who Johnny Carson was so the white people made fun of me. Now I have lived in America for eight months and I am very well educated and on the way to being an attorney.


I see that you have angered the white people. That is unwise in my opinion. I will send you a friend request but I have to admit to you that many I have befriended have been banned eventually. I am sure this is only a coincidence.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

Well when you say it like that being ignorant doesn't sound like the terrible insult it's made out to be

Oh, it's not so bad at all. In fact, I daresay if you ask Christian preachers across the nation and across the globe if they prefer ignorant but trusting parishioners or know-it-all parishioners, they'll tell you they prefer the ignorant but trusting ones. Jesus tells us we must think like a child in order to hope for Salvation (Matthew 18:3). You see, children are ignorant and yet trustworthy. Why, you could teach a young child anything, and if you are their parent, grand parent, teacher, trusted adult, or really, an adult or older kid is enough, and they will naturally believe you. How else do you explain the vast numbers of children who believe in Santa Claus, despite the fact that every single one of them know a fat man could never in a million years fit down a chimney with a sack of toys, much less fly back up it by touching his finger to his nose, and then proceed to do that to every house of every Christian family with children around the world while they sleep. And don't get me started on the flying reindeer. I mean, good grief. You might as well say they're blind, radio-active, gigantic, cannibalistic, humanoid, underground dwelling reindeer and kids won't care. They'll believe it hook, line, and sinker. They enjoy the happy rewards of belief and so they embrace ignorance, and so Christ holds that up as a model for us.

[Dotty too]

Originally Posted by Basilissa

It's not too terrible because it's very easily curable by learning.

It gets worse, however, when a person decides to stay ignorant by choosing not to learn.

I actually searched up Baptist to see what makes you different and I found this wiki page (Wikipedia has a page for everything):


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

I actually searched up Baptist to see what makes you different and I found this wiki page (Wikipedia has a page for everything):


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists

What kind of forum did you think you joined?

[Elmer G. White]

Originally Posted by Dotty too

I actually searched up Baptist to see what makes you different and I found this wiki page (Wikipedia has a page for everything):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists

Originally Posted by Mary Etheldreda

What kind of forum did you think you joined?

Verily, Sister Mary!

Moreover, why would anyone rely on second-hand information, references that may contain copy errors and conscious twisting of the message, when Godly primary sources would be available! For instance, our Glorious Statement of True™ Faith!

Joshua 15:19
Who answered, Give me a blessing; for thou hast given me a south land; give me also springs of water. And he gave her the upper springs, and the nether springs.

Even further, we encounter the One Original Source of All Knowledge!




Yours in Christ,

Elmer