Creation Science The origins of life and the earth from a creationist (Biblical) perspective. |
|
Christ Certified Ex-Negro - A white man's white man
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 247
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
|
The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-15-2008, 05:37 PM
We know that dinosaurs(i.e. Behemoths, Job 40:15-18) existed alongside mankind. The Allied Atheist Agenda invented the concept of carbon dating as a direct attack against morality, order, and justice. We can never let ourselves forget that atheist have no morals and guiltlessly engage in rapes, murders, theft, etc. in the name of "free thought".
Atheist claim that there are atoms. Hydrogen, the simplest and most basic atom, is supposedly made up of one electron and one proton. All other atoms are supposedly just hydrogens added together. Perhaps you've heard of water being referred to as H2O. This represents one hydrogen atom and two oxygen atoms. For argument's sake we'll just say an oxygen atom is two hydrogens placed together; thus two protons and two electrons.
Here is the problem: Given what we know about atoms, that they are supposedly all made up of the same particles, protons and electrons(the occasional neutron), it strikes any keen intellect as absurd to state that completely different forms of matter can form out of the same parts. Water and Iron are made of the same material according to atheists.
That is akin to stating that if you put a basketball and a marble together it forms hydrogen, but if you place two basketballs and two marbles together you get oxygen. And to top it all off if you place five basketballs and five marble together you get water. But any rational person can clearly see that they are all still basketballs and marbles no matter how many of them you have or how they are arranged.
On this basis alone one can completely rule out the very possibility of carbon dating. The entire concept of atoms, much less carbon dating, is evidently a hoax designed by atheists to promote homosexuality, lawlessness, and the collapse of civilization.
|
|
Senior Pastor VP of Evangelical Outreach On FIRE for Jesus
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,016
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Libertydale, NC
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-15-2008, 06:44 PM
Excellent work, Joshua. You cut those atheist myths to the quick and showed how ridiculous atomism really is. Those jokers will believe anything, no matter how ludicrous, except for the Truth of the Bible.
Bless you, Brother.
Pastor Billy-Reuben
Upon request I will cite scripture for all these facts in God's Holy Word.
✝ This is a Christian community and we worship GOD of the Holy bible, the only Living GOD. We worship Jesus Christ, Son of GOD and Savior. Anything else is absurd. ✝
Trump / Arpaio 2016 -- The Government We Deserve
#ChristianLivesMatter
|
|
Landover Security Superviser Asset Loss Prevention and Personal Security Expert NOT angry and positively NOT Gay
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 18,555
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold Iowa
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-15-2008, 07:27 PM
I’m with Pastor Billy-Reuben on this. Your’ fair and balanced article Josuha unmasks the fallacy of naturalistic reasoning. Jesus knows how much damage this myth of radioactivity has done. For instance radioactivity is used to justify how the earth can be so hot after the ridiculous age the secularist give it; magic rocks in the earth make it hot. Radiation is all very convenient for the atheists since you can only detect it with instruments they came up with! The whole Darwinist house of cards is based on radiation.
Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.
Hot Must ReadThreads!
Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!
|
|
Honorary True Christian™ Sweet Placid Sister
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 9,562
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Surrounded by hippie vermin
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-19-2008, 05:04 AM
Mr. Brooks, your brilliant dissection of the very foundations of "science" has only whet my appetite for learning! One taste of your swollen intellect has left me drooling for more . . . Truly, a mind IS a terrible thing to waste!
What are your thoughts on electricity?
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,546
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pastor Deacon Fred Hall, Landover Christian University School of Law, Freehold, Iowa, God's Country
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-19-2008, 06:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Radiation is all very convenient for the atheists since you can only detect it with instruments they came up with!
|
Or with a Scientology E-Meter.
I like to turn mine up to 11. And I love the way the put a "test" setting on it.
Pour out thy fury upon the heathen that know thee not, and upon the families that call not on thy name.... Jeremiah 10:25
|
|
Senior Usher True Christian™ missionary to the Unsaved Kingdom A very nice young man
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 15,647
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Yorkshire, hotbed of sin
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-19-2008, 06:02 PM
In 1905, Albert Einstein wrote "On the Movement of Small Particles...", his analysis of Brownian Motion, and developed a hypothetical mathematical model of molecule theory. The same year, the first, unsuccessful, Russian Revolution broke out. Coincidence? I think not.
O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it--for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.
God being truth, justice, goodness, beauty, power, and life, man is falsehood, iniquity, evil, ugliness, impotence, and death. God being master, man is the slave. Incapable of finding justice, truth, and eternal life by his own effort, he can attain them only through a divine revelation... he who desires to worship God must harbor no childish illusions about the matter, but bravely renounce his liberty and humanity.
|
|
Christ Certified Ex-Negro - A white man's white man
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 247
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-19-2008, 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahimaaz Smith
Or with a Scientology E-Meter.
I like to turn mine up to 11. And I love the way the put a "test" setting on it.
|
The only thing that is good for is detecting stupidity and craziness.
|
|
Unsaved trash
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 17
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-20-2008, 07:14 PM
That doesn't make any sense.
"The Allied Atheist Agenda invented the concept of carbon dating as a direct attack against morality, order, and justice. We can never let ourselves forget that atheist have no morals and guiltlessly engage in rapes, murders, theft, etc. in the name of "free thought"."
Carbon dating was not invented. Are you aware of the concepts of carbon dating? Well, isotopes of carbon are radioactive, and we can measure the rate of radioactive decay to determine the age of something. Carbon dating SUPPORTS your opinions! Don't dispute it! Carbon dating can only date things up to thousands of years, not millions as people think. Carbon dating is responsible for proving how old many religious documents are and help Christians sort out fact from fake documents! What you want to dispute, as someone with your opinions is other dating methods, such as lead isotope dating. Most atheists have morals, and do not freely go around raping and murdering people. Only a few people do that, and let us not forget, some Christians rape and murder to.
"Atheist claim that there are atoms. Hydrogen, the simplest and most basic atom, is supposedly made up of one electron and one proton. All other atoms are supposedly just hydrogens added together. Perhaps you've heard of water being referred to as H2O. This represents one hydrogen atom and two oxygen atoms. For argument's sake we'll just say an oxygen atom is two hydrogens placed together; thus two protons and two electrons."
Atheists are the majority of humanity, Christians or otherwise, believe that there are atoms. Seeing is believing, and we can see atoms! Not in the traditional sense, perhaps, but we can. What is wrong with atomic theory in terms of Christianity? It doesn't go against any Biblical principles!
Two hydrogens = H2, not water. Hydrogen has an Ar of 1, oxygen has an Ar of 16. Last time I checked, 1+1 = 2, not 18, which is the Mr of water. The above comment you made is a scientific shambles, well, actually, just a shambles generally.
Lets take a quick look at the Periodic Table. Oxygen is in group six. To have a complete electron shell oxygen wants to bond with two more electrons to make 8 (a complete election shell). Hydrogen is in group one, and has one electron, two hydrogens would make up the difference. Similary, NaCl, or table salt. Na (sodium) is in group 1 so it wants to LOOSE an electron to give it 8 outer electrons (on another electron shell). Cl (Chlorine) is in group 7, and wants one electron. So if Na donates an electron to Cl you get full electron shells on both, and they ionically bond.
Thats it in a nutshell...There is a bit more than that in reality, though.
"Here is the problem: Given what we know about atoms, that they are supposedly all made up of the same particles, protons and electrons(the occasional neutron), it strikes any keen intellect as absurd to state that completely different forms of matter can form out of the same parts. Water and Iron are made of the same material according to atheists.
That is akin to stating that if you put a basketball and a marble together it forms hydrogen, but if you place two basketballs and two marbles together you get oxygen. And to top it all off if you place five basketballs and five marble together you get water. But any rational person can clearly see that they are all still basketballs and marbles no matter how many of them you have or how they are arranged."
The occasional neutron? No no no...Neutrons are present in every element except hydrogen. Neutrons are fundamental and very important. Now, there is more to it than that. We are made up of quarks, which are made up of smaller particles yet, such as Z-particles. Anyway, thats irrelevent. Chemistry is the transfer of electrons, thus creating a chemical reaction to create new compounds. All elements want a complete electron shell, so loose or gain electrons to achieve this. This is why we get water and other compounds. Without going on for a long time its hard to demonstrate this. Its easier to think about it in terms of bonds, not particles. A compound called epoxyethane has very strained bonds between carbon and oxygen, and thus is very reactive because the bonds break. This can be demonstrated by using models.
There is a distinct difference between basketballs and atomic particles. Atomic particles have charges, which dictates how they will react. Sodium chloride (table salt) has a very high melting temperature because of strong ionic bonds, formed by a +1 charge (on sodium) and a -1 charge (on chlorine). This obviously means they are attracted to each other in exactly the same way magnets are attracted to each other. So we need to put in a lot of energy to break the bonds.
On this basis alone one can completely rule out the very possibility of carbon dating. The entire concept of atoms, much less carbon dating, is evidently a hoax designed by atheists to promote homosexuality, lawlessness, and the collapse of civilization.
This makes no sense at all. Carbon dating is due to radioactive decay...Again, this can be observed, easily, as the radioactive decay of uranium and plutonium provides energy for nuclear reactors. We can measure the ratio between carbon 13 and carbon 12 and thus determine how much the carbon has decayed to determine the age of something. Carbon dating does not undermine anything, as I said previously, its supportive of Creation science as it only gives ages of thousands of years, not millions! Carbon dating does not promote homosexuality or anything bad! Its just a useful technique and is crucial to our knowledge of our own religion!
|
|
Christ Certified Ex-Negro - A white man's white man
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 247
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
|
Re: The Atomic Foundations of Science Debunked -
01-19-2008, 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JennyD
Mr. Brooks, your brilliant dissection of the very foundations of "science" has only whet my appetite for learning! One taste of your swollen intellect has left me drooling for more . . . Truly, a mind IS a terrible thing to waste!
What are your thoughts on electricity?
|
I am very please that my counter argument to the fallacy of atomic theory watered your appetite for learning, Jenny. Although thinking is a male orientated field it is refreshing to see a woman eager to learn in silence with all due humility just as Jesus teaches us in His Holy Word. I don't think we've meet. I've been so busy with college and my duties at the Creation Science Museum that I haven't had time to introduce myself to any of the new faces in Freehold. I would be glad to share my wide breath of knowledge and throbbing enthusiaism for creation physics with you.
OK, Electricity.
The Atheist Claim: The Allied Atheist Agenda would like us to believe that opposites attract. They claim that protons(one component of a so-called atom) carry a positive charge and electrons(another component of a so-called atom) carry a negative charge. The ultimate power source and origin of said "charged energy" is conviently left out by the atheist. They claim that if you load one end of a circuit with positrons(positive charged stuff) and then load the other end with negatrons, that the negatrons will flock to the positrons. The flow of electrons is referred to as electricity.
The Problem: Seeing that atheist claim that all matter is composed of atoms, which we previous simplified to hydrogen, which is broken down further in electron-proton...
1.) Wouldn't a load of positrons be non-matter without an electron to make it a complete hydrogen?
2.) If it already has electrons and is matter, then why would it need to draw more electrons?
3.) Wouldn't this positronic stuff suck the electrons out of the very circuit board parts immediately surrounding it instead of a bunch of electrons way on the other side of the circuit?
Let's face facts here. At some point the positrons are gonna get enough electrons to stop being a positron. Then what? Atheist say this is how a battery runs out of juice. Fair enough. But what about objects that don't use batteries? They counter with the concept of "earth ground". But even the earth in all its 6,000 years is gonna eventual get enough electrons to loss its positive disposition. And if it's so positive why isn't it sucking the electrons out of everything on the surface? Why isn't there a huge electrical spark betweeb earth and the moon? If the moon is also positively charged then why isn't it getting flung away since like pushes away like? Are talking about electricity here or magnets? Make up your mind secular science!
The Test: I placed a battery on the ground with the negative side toouching the earth. It did not get drained of usefulness. Nothing magically went to this supposed "earth ground". And with that yet another secular myth is laid to rest.
The Truth: God makes the lighting and the lightning is electricity. It goes where He wants it to go and powers what He wants it to power. Who are we, as mere mortals, to possibly understand His mysteries? God controls it just like you controls the wind, the oceans, and the suns light. And through His grace we also get power from windmill, dams, and solar panels. Clearly "power" does not equal electrons so much as it equals GOD. GLORY!!!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|