[Bobby-Joe]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...a05_story.html

The Associate Press DARES suggest ISIS isn't the greatest threat America has faced since Hilter, Stalin and King.

BEIRUT — The Islamic State group is often described as the most fearsome jihadi outfit of all: a global menace outweighing al-Qaida, with armies trembling before its advance.

A Godly and correct statement. ISIS is the spear head of the Islam-Secularist alliance stabbing at the heart of the Middle East. One just has to look at Iraq now and see it is filled with Anti-Americans and UN-American practices.

Most analysts, however, estimate the number of Islamic State fighters in both Iraq and Syria to be about 20,000.

So what? Dictators like Mussoline and King marched with less.

he Iraqi military and police force are estimated at more than 1 million. The Syrian army is estimated at 300,000 soldiers. There are believed to be more than 100,000 Syrian rebels, including the al-Qaida-linked Nusra Front and the powerful Islamic Front rebel umbrella group, currently fighting the Islamic State group in Syria. Tens of thousands of Kurdish Peshmerga forces are fighting the group in Iraq.

blah, blah, boring.

The Iraqi official, who declined to be identified because he is not authorized to brief the media, told The Associated Press that the group’s arsenal includes Kalashnikovs, machine guns, anti-aircraft guns and mortars, adding that they also have about 35 Iraqi military tanks, about 80 armored police vehicles and hundreds of Humvees.

Hello, Al Quida didn't have 35 tanks on 911. ISIS is clearly a 100 times worse than Al Quida and we all know how bad Al Quida was!

“ISIS has a critical capability to design military campaigns that outmatch those of rival militaries in Iraq and Syria, but those military strategies can be overmatched by U.S. strategists, planners and advisers,” it added.

Of course, America has something ISIS doesn't have - JESUS. With Jesus ANY army, no matter how powerful it is can be overcome, even ISIS

We need less drones and more Jesus and we can reclaim Iraq for America.

[Cranky Old Man]

Only with Obama in office ISIS, IS or whatever they are called this week could happen. With George W. Bush there would now have been a radioactive pile of ashes showing the world not to mess with America.

The only real solution for the problems in the Middle East is to do as God commands us in 2nd Chronicles 15:13 and nuke all those unbelievers to the eternal fires of Hell. After we pumped up all the oil of course, my Hummer loves his gallons.

[VictoryOS]

I can not BELIEVE they would say something like this! And on 9/11 no less!!!

The LIEBERAL MEDIA is getting out of hand!

[Russell Holbeck]

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

Of course, America has something ISIS doesn't have - JESUS. With Jesus ANY army, no matter how powerful it is can be overcome, even ISIS

Hello Bobby-Joe.

I like your post but this part got me worried what if the Muslim people decide to accept Jesus as their Savior then every battle will be a tie.

Thank you.

Rusty

P.S. Never mind we would not be fighting them if they loved Jesus.

[Alvin Moss]

President Obama says he is going to drop bombs on the Muslims because they are the enemies of America.

Probably he should go on and bomb the AP at the same time.

[landmen]

so you see again how hypocritical you Christian
[NAUGHTY WORD REMOVED BY MODERATOR] are
now you are destroyed,
you are the same as isis
with your cancer faith

[WWJDnow]

Now we know why Associated Press starts with "Ass." Luckily, this sort of MSM filth doesn't make it onto Fox, the only trustworthy news source in America except for our own Truth and Light.

[Bobby-Joe]

It is just sad on the anniversary of 911 the Lame Stream Media publishes this anti-American rubbish like that. The Washington post could have just as well have changed their banner to green and sworn allegiance to Allah when they accepted this article.

[Calvinist]

Have you noticed the distinction being made by Prez Obama? He only considers liberal moderate Muslims, Muslims. So another words, only those that give lip service, saying behead the infidel, or the teaching Quran, but don't believe in actually doing it are Muslim. And those who are actually promoting the cause of Islam are not Muslim.

According to Obama's logic, it is like Mormons declaring war in the name of Christianity and nothing more being done by Christians, other than a statement that Mormons are not Christians. Doesn't this reflect on Obama's Christianity as well as the Liberal/progressive moderate Christians, and also the Pacifist?

I think there should be a call for Muslims to oppose the false doctrine of what is being declared by extremist. Take responsibility for those within your midst? The hypocrite is the most dangerous among all of us alike because they exists in between the walls of our place of worship. But wait, consider all the above, wouldn't it is an oxymormon for liberal moderates to do that? And they won't speak out or leave the Islamic faith for fear of being declared an Apostate, yet the liberal Muslims are not being charged for hypocrisy.

Fact is, throughout history the Pacifist and moderate majority have never made a difference in history. When the Japanese killed millions, the moderate "peace loving" Japanese made no difference. When Hitler took power, the majority of moderate "peace loving" Germans made no difference. When the Nazis came into power as extremist the German people took no responsibility for their actions.

When George Bush made the statement that we will not differentiate between the terrorist and the ones who harbor them, did they make us hypocrites and exclude us from self examination?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by Calvinist

Have you noticed the distinction being made by Prez Obama? He only considers liberal moderate Muslims, Muslims. So another words, only those that give lip service, saying behead the infidel, or the teaching Quran, but don't believe in actually doing it are Muslim. And those who are actually promoting the cause of Islam are not Muslim.

According to Obama's logic, it is like Mormons declaring war in the name of Christianity and nothing more being done by Christians, other than a statement that Mormons are not Christians. Doesn't this reflect on Obama's Christianity as well as the Liberal/progressive moderate Christians, and also the Pacifist?

I think there should be a call for Muslims to oppose the false doctrine of what is being declared by extremist. Take responsibility for those within your midst? The hypocrite is the most dangerous among all of us alike because they exists in between the walls of our place of worship. But wait, consider all the above, wouldn't it is an oxymormon for liberal moderates to do that? And they won't speak out or leave the Islamic faith for fear of being declared an Apostate, yet the liberal Muslims are not being charged for hypocrisy.

Fact is, throughout history the Pacifist and moderate majority have never made a difference in history. When the Japanese killed millions, the moderate "peace loving" Japanese made no difference. When Hitler took power, the majority of moderate "peace loving" Germans made no difference. When the Nazis came into power as extremist the German people took no responsibility for their actions.

When George Bush made the statement that we will not differentiate between the terrorist and the ones who harbor them, did they make us hypocrites and exclude us from self examination?

Shouts Glory!

I agree. Completely.

No way would GW let those commie Islamofascists get away with having a regular and a visible front in an actual theatre of war.

Did not David deal so permenantly to the Children of Ammon? If Obamma was a little more like GW Bush and David from the Bible those no good heathens wouldn't be knocking on our doors right now, I expect.

Preaching to the choir buddy, preaching to the choir.

YIC

[Alvin Moss]

I agree that the moderate head choppers are as dangerous as the radical head choppers and they should all be dealt with harshly.

On that note- I would like to lodge a protest and I hope other Christians will join with me. We have been saving up our atomic bombs for a long time and it has been almost 70 years since we used one of them. What is the use of spending all that money to build them and store them and guard them if we aren't going to use them?

I don't see why we can't send some of those bombs over to Araby today and blow up all those Muslims. It wouldn't change the landscape at all, so there would be no more trouble than usual with the Sierra Club. It doesn't make any sense to keep putting up with violent Muslims when we can get rid of them right now.

That is my opinion.

[Basilissa]

Originally Posted by Alvin Moss

I agree that the moderate head choppers are as dangerous as the radical head choppers and they should all be dealt with harshly.

On that note- I would like to lodge a protest and I hope other Christians will join with me. We have been saving up our atomic bombs for a long time and it has been almost 70 years since we used one of them. What is the use of spending all that money to build them and store them and guard them if we aren't going to use them?

I don't see why we can't send some of those bombs over to Araby today and blow up all those Muslims. It wouldn't change the landscape at all, so there would be no more trouble than usual with the Sierra Club. It doesn't make any sense to keep putting up with violent Muslims when we can get rid of them right now.

That is my opinion.

You bring up an excellent point, Brother Alvin. Drones and such don't make any difference; for every Muslim man, woman, and child killed by drones, there are five new enemies (sons, daughters, siblings) who will grow up to hate those who killed their family members. Taking a few nukes and grilling that whole area would be the best final solution of the terrorist problem.