Quote:
Originally Posted by BelieverInGod
Because it's 1611 spelling. As I said, I doubt that most, with a public school education, would be able to comprehend the REAL 1611 KJV Bible. So I offered a link to a simpler version. If you compare it to the version you linked to, you will see the spelling is the same, just in different fonts.
I got brave and clicked on your link and was pleasantly surprised to see it really was a scan of a Bible. Is it an official 1611 KJV Bible? I don't know, one of the Pastors would have to answer that question as I have no idea who Furness is. It looks like the real thing, but I'm not a Biblical scholar.
As for Garcia's link, it's just NIV lies. I guess if you're so dumb you find the KJV Bible too "hard" to read, you'll find anything that makes you feel better about reading an easier (per)version.
|
Forget the Garcia stuff for now ok? Over and over it is said in this forum to only believe the 1611 KJV, as a new poster to the forum YOUR members gave me the link to this Bible where I copied it's text. Why do you question the results taken from the link provided by YOUR fourm? Would a pastor please verify this link as a link to the official 1611 KJV.
If the link is correct Why doesn't everyone agree with my post? If the link is incorrect, please stop sending people to a source of incorrect information and then say that a persons "public school education" is why the said person doesn't understand.