Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael Van Helsing
[/COLOR]
I wasn't talking about Darren.
I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done. Artificial insemination, technically that requires a man's input but that's it. The woman has no contact with the man whatsoever for the insemination process.
I was saying that, when the baby is first made, the X and Y chromosomes determine male or female. If it's a girl she will get X chromosomes, if its a boy he will get the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome will not show itself in a female baby.
Where on earth did you get the idea that I was talking about male-free conception?
|
You can't have it both ways, witch.
Either you're saying this X(female) chromosome is 100% the product of a woman, in which case you are also stating that not having a Y chromozone makes one the product of a mother alone since X would be a female only chromozone.
Or in the case that the male and the female play a part in procreation, the X chromozone must also be of the male. In which case both X and Y are male since an XX(female) or an YX(male) are both the comobination of male and female.
Some king back in the old days killed his wife, then his second wife, then his third and who knows how many more because he kept having females and no male heirs. Secular pseudo-scientist, your false gods, claim he didn't have any Y's or some rubbish. Clearly everything, rather X or Y, would be of the male according to even false secular fairy tales.
Get right with Jesus, wench.