Quote:
Originally Posted by LyingDingDong
Mount Improbable is written to give the reader insight that design exists without a designer. Natural selection. Even if Genesis is correct
|
What do you mean, “Even if Genesis is correct…?” It’s the first Book of the Bible! God is not going to make a mistake on the first page is He?
Quote:
you can not deny that natural selection exists and results in complexity and design over a given length of time.
|
Have you ever visited a site called “Landoverbaptist.org”? I suggest you do, because that will answer your question!
Quote:
In order to read Mount Improbable you have think that order came about without God.
|
Unthinkable!
Quote:
Think for yourself and not just what this online soceity tells you how to think.
|
God does 90% of my thinking – this is the reward of Faith! You’ve no idea how many worries this simple act dispels! Praise!
Quote:
This is a cruel experiment because you deliberately did not do any reasearch on how evolution works before attempting the experiment.
|
You keep posting on how evolution works – I read what you said – I assume that that is sufficient? Or have you been misleading us?
Quote:
You ask, “Which secularist could have thought that dolphins could forget how to swim?”. The dolphins didn't “forget” to swim, they most likely were so dramatized from the horrific events that they lost all motor abilities.
|
Well, if they were dramatized, they deserve Oscars! The were unmoving and belly-up!
Quote:
You're implying that evolution works as though it can be recovered from memory.
|
Like riding a bike – once learned, never forgotten. Or are you implying that evolution works as a one-way street in which previous advantage is discarded? That would be disadvantageous!
Quote:
If there was anything that repels me from Christianity and accepting Jesus Christ as my Savior, it would be you Ezekiel Bathfire.
|
I can lead horses to water but I can’t make them drink; There are none as blind as they that will not see!
Quote:
I will admit that some scientists are sceptical on the theory of evolution because of irreducible complexity and could give the idea of an intelligent designer a thought.
|
As pleased as I am to hear that you are willing to embark upon the Road To Salvation by accepting God exists, I see Intelligent Design as pandering to the unholy creed of so-called science! It is like an atheist becoming an agnostic: an atheist would say that this is a retrograde step!
Quote:
However, the scientists that believe in evolution enormously outweigh the number of scientists that don't.
|
Nice to see you speaking for the entire scientific community but let me tell you, that none of the scientists at Landover believe this! So your “all” is a bit off.
Quote:
You have no proof that Dawkins is a communist or a sodomite. It's not listed in the Bible thus it can not be accurate. Give me one link that supports the idea that Dawkins is either a communist or a sodomite and I'll give you a cookie.
|
LyingDingDong – you are an idiot! You are just about to lose a bet again and even though the wager is only a cookie, you are not going to pay up! Dawkins speaks continually of the evolutionary advantage of co-operation; he speaks of how organisms that aid others tend to fare better. Marx it was who said, “from each according to his ability, to each according to their need.” You will see that Marx and Dawkins are at one; ergo Dawkins is a communist!
WHERE’S MY COOKIE!!!!