View Single Post
(#215)
Old
TheLittleBoy's Avatar
TheLittleBoy TheLittleBoy is offline
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured

The AIDS Homer

 
Posts: 63
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: the people's republic of cannukistan
TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.TheLittleBoy is a sinner who is given over to unnatural affections and blasphemy, and whose chances of Salvation© are limited.
Default Re: other planets do not exist! - 07-03-2014, 10:13 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmer G. White View Post
My dear Boy,

Your post is a delightful example of a fallacy called equivocation. The secular definition of planets that we discuss and refute here is that "of a celestial body that is in size comparable to the Earth, that circulates the Sun, has cleared its neighborhood of its alleged orbit and is an object the existence of which is based on the secular cosmological model". You equivocate it to mean "something you can see with the naked eye". We object to the first definition, not to the existence of these spots of light.
First of all, my post is without equivocation as there is no ambiguity with the word planet. I simply said you can observe them yourself in the sky, preferably when it's dark. If you have a telescope, you can clearly see they are not simply spots of light but clearly a round object that looks likes the definition of a planet. By 2 Kings 23:5 , why would god call them planets instead of stars if they were mere spots of light? Simple logic.







Quote:
Quote:
Of course there are lights in the Firmament. No-one here has claimed otherwise! The Sun and the lights in the Sky are relatively small and their exact proportions, etc., have been carefully determined!
This claim is out of ignorance. The guy just said random numbers, he didn't even give the right temperature for the sun. Not only the sun's gravity pull would obliterate earth, it's around 109 times the size of the earth, the sun's surface is 5778 K ( 5505 °C ). Do you seriously believe that the sun is 491.1 miles above us? Doesn't a little spark of intelligence in your brain tell you that all life on earth would be impossible with such a high temperature only 491.1 miles above us?



Quote:
Quote:
Your post is also a wonderful example of a straw man fallacy. You twist the words of True Christian™ Believers and attack the distorted argument, as it is easier for you to attempt to refute the simplification. The actual arguments can be found in the links and in this Forum. Your twisted argument is that we deny the existence of visible lights in the Firmament, which is untruthful.
You seem to fail to understand the definition of a straw man.
Reply With Quote