Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRight
It is PROVED that the bible was written by man 400-600 years after the death of christ. IF you continue to argue with fact you are proving your own ignorance.
It is also PROVED that the bible contradicts itself over 100 times which is only natural as it is a compilation of stories written at least 400 years after it happened and was done by monks who had not really experienced life outside a monastery.
You cannot argue with FACT. You might aswell argue that the sky is actually a dark shade of brown at midday. You will only be proving you own misunderstanding of the cocept of fact and strengthening my argument.
|
No it isn't. Ever heard of the Dead Sea scrolls? The Essenes? Masada?
Here's another one.
Deuteronomy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRight
It is PROVED that the bible was written by man 400-600 years after the death of christ. IF you continue to argue with fact you are proving your own ignorance.
It is also PROVED that the bible contradicts itself over 100 times which is only natural as it is a compilation of stories written at least 400 years after it happened and was done by monks who had not really experienced life outside a monastery.
You cannot argue with FACT. You might aswell argue that the sky is actually a dark shade of brown at midday. You will only be proving you own misunderstanding of the cocept of fact and strengthening my argument.
|
..as you have demonstrated by arguing with made up premises, straw men and baboon logic.
FACT is not subject to argument at ALL because it is FACT.
BROWN SECTION To argue that the sky is actually a dark shade of brown would be arguing about the colour of the sky, not an epistemological discourse.
BABOON COLOURED SECTION The baboon icon is clickable for additional information about logic (since you slready seem well informed about their behaviour).