So basically, Galileo denounced God’s Word that the Earth was the centre of the Universe and was, as a Catlick, destined for Hell in any case. However, he fell into the hands of the Antichrist whose agenda of deception encompassed that part of God’s Word regarding the Creation, which he had done so as to add verisimilitude to his other deceptions.
Galileo then gets house arrest until his death in 1642 and, nevertheless, refuses to accept KJV 1611 as the inerrant word of God.
On February 15, 1990, one Cardinal Ratzinger (anyone know this man?) cited some current views on the Galileo affair as forming what he called
"a symptomatic case that permits us to see how deep the self-doubt of the modern age, of science and technology goes today." And if anyone knows what that means, please drop me a line.
Ratzinger continued with a quote from Feyerabend,
Quote:
“The Church at the time of Galileo kept much more closely to reason than did Galileo himself, and she took into consideration the ethical and social consequences of Galileo's teaching too. Her verdict against Galileo was rational and just and the revision of this verdict can be justified only on the grounds of what is politically opportune.” Ratzinger did not clearly indicate whether he agreed or disagreed with Feyerabend's assertions. He did, however, say "It would be foolish to construct an impulsive apologetic on the basis of such views".
|
On 31 October 1992, Pope John Paul II expressed regret for how the Galileo affair was handled, and officially announced that the Earth was not stationary, thus falling into the same trap as Galileo… Ratzinger has yet to say anything.
As the Antichrist knows that the earth is the centre of Creation, I suspect he’ll come out and say it.