Evidence. Not. Supported. By. Assertion.
is there a prize?
__________________________________________________
Here's a great example from our resident "scientist"
Absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Therefore, there is no evidence to prove
An outstanding start there, precisely the opposite of what any secularist claims particularly secularist physicists (and especially astrophysicists), chemists and biologists. And secularist mediums, warlocks & necromancers for that matter just in case any persistent dolt was going to introduce such a theme in a "debunking" display.
OK, so moving on to another post we get:
..which surpasses even the opening gambit [above] in that the "logic" dumped on us employs the very method whereby such "rationalists" as I suppose Mr Lunkhead considers himself to be demonstrate his tenet to be false.
How very sad that despite his considerable entertainment value Mr Lunkhead is on the well buttered tube leading directly to
HELL. FOREVER
.