Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLittleBoy
|
My dear Boy,
Your post is a delightful example of a fallacy called
equivocation. The secular definition of planets that we discuss and refute here is that "of a celestial body that is in size comparable to the Earth, that circulates the Sun, has cleared its neighborhood of
its alleged orbit and is an object the existence of which is based on the secular cosmological model". You equivocate it to mean "something you can see with the naked eye". We object to the first definition,
not to the existence of these spots of light.
Of course there are lights in the Sky,
God Created them.
Genesis 1:14-15
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
Of course there are lights in the Firmament. No-one here has claimed otherwise!
The Sun and the lights in the Sky are relatively small and their exact proportions,
etc., have been
carefully determined!
Your post is also a wonderful example of a
straw man fallacy. You twist the words of True Christian™ Believers and attack the distorted argument, as it is easier for you to attempt to refute the simplification. The actual arguments can be found in the links and in this Forum. Your twisted argument is that we deny the existence of visible lights in the Firmament, which is untruthful
.
The Bible is the TRUTH. The Whole Bible. Including the Genesis. Including the
wonderful Historical account of the lights in the Firmament. Of course we do not doubt this account!
Revelation 22:19
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.
Yours in Christ,
Elmer