Originally Posted by Dr Laurence Niles
Why can't you keep your mind out of the sewer?
A book of grammar might help too. As an example of how this "asexual" demon ruins everything just read this:
...That's not what that orientation means... at all. Hetero[preference for the opposite sex]-sapioromantic [someone who views intelligence as the most romantically desirable quality, as opposed to sapiosexual] asexual [someone who has no sexual attraction to either gender].
I had not mentioned orientation but that's OK, it was in Mr Pendergast's post, then we get "Hetero" (with the hyphen in the wrong place). Confusion over appengages, such as hyphens, spreads like amœbas in an infected brain
and the contamination becomes universal.
Hetero- is a prefix meaning different
and is used in many combinations such as Heteroskedasticity (to pick a random example). When combined with a word like Sapioromantic it suggests romantic attraction to persons either more or less Sapient than oneself. Since no two persons are identical, Heterosapioromantic is a meaningless expression embracing the entire population of the world (other than oneself) as romantically desirable.
It is important for schoolchildren to understand these simple concepts so that they have an answer ready when teachers start in with the secularist agenda. One of the more insidious aspects of atheistic programming is to change the meaning of words. Gender is a characteristic of language, not of sexual reproduction. Languages having masculine or feminine nouns and adjectives are usually spoken while waving the arms around and since English speeakers do not do that gender is applied in a more general sort of way: a feminine dress for example, or a masculine cigar.
"He struck a masculine pose puffing his cigar outside Burgess's fish sauce shop, welcoming her in. Elegant in Dior that afternoon, she was the very picture of femininity adorned with fluttering chiffon and what a delightful couple they made."
Satan pounces. "Let's pervert their language," he ululates. "Just think about all the made-up genders we can foist upon them!" and foist he did. In his newspeak dictionary (the latest edition) there are genders within genders and whithersoever satan goes thither go the genders for the spirit of satan is in the genders and aren't there a terrible lot of them?
nutters imagining themselves to be trapped in a body of the wrong "gender"
perverts wishing to couple with their own "gender"
maniacs who have "gender reassignment" so that they can become homosexuals
wretches who graft on bits of the opposite sex so that they can invent a whole new "gender"
deluded asexual psychotics who just want to mock God's Plan for redemption
goths (who knows what plumbing arrangements they've cooked up?)
zoophiles (yes, this is a "gender" too apparently)
body mods such as horns under the scalp to look like a demon
and on and on and on. The Bible does not endorse any of those "alternatives" indeed The Bible is very clear. God explains:
22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
KJV .. context
God knew what would be going on in these, the last, days. The Bible is clear that such antics are shameful and that all those "genders" know their antics to be shameful. Therefore we know that they are ashamed. That is why they use the word PRIDE, prance around wearing incandescent underwear often with little lights flashing on and off advertising prices and most horrific of all, denying God. "The Bible does not mean what it says," they declaim. "It means what we say it means and we say it means nothing at all." But God both HEARS and SEES and soon Jesus will return to smite them all with death.
Then it's HELL FOREVER.
I know that amœbæ is the Latin plural, but I am writing in English and refering to a colony of the things, not to the taxonomic group