"Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
CNN is trying to explain, but I'm not sure I understand:
Quote:
I don't understand. Indians have red skin. Why is that offensive? I don't mind being called a lady, because that's what I am. If someone says I have fair, flawless skin, I don't cry and try to sue them. Because it's true. Just like Indians and their red skin. Can someone please explain? http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/.../9Tza5baTE.png |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
I don't get it, sister. In our world, we call a spade a spade.
It don't know why they dance :giggle: around the issue. Just look at this redskin all ready to rape and pillage. http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/b...01/6630400.jpg |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
How is anyone meant to distinguish between dot injuns and redskin injuns then? :confused:
They might have to rename them the Washington Injuns, but then all the turbanheads will think it's their team. |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
This is clearly the work of insidious liberals who never rest at trying to undermine every great American institution.
I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays. As for me, I'll continue to root for my beloved Patriots, who have the most Godly name in football. (Not the Saints, who are named after cathylick idols.) |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
:huh: |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
So what are they supposed to call themselves? The Washington Native Americans? Because that term discriminates against all other Americans, by which I mean Real Americans, good folk who were born in the USA and are therefore "native" to the country.
This is just disgusting and there should be an international protest. |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Rep Steven King has the explain Sister
https://twitter.com/SteveKingIA Quote:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)? I know the beaners jump the border, so they're from Mexico. They call themselves Indians but I've yet to see a dothead flail around with dead birds on their heads. Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air! I think it's shameful we honor them with an AMERICAN football team (when we have no idea where they originated) and they stab us right in the back. :angry: Who is next? The White Sox, for being racist? |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
I've wondered for years where they came from. They are always complaining about their treatment here. If they had just stayed in whatever country they are from they wouldn't have these problems. |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Didn't they come from Canuckistan?
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
God gave white folk this country for a reason. |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
I never understand all these red, yellow and black people complaining about racism all the time. If they took regular baths and had jobs they would look just like decent white Republican Christians.
http://i.imgur.com/Vkjig9O.png |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
I've always thought they are immigrants from India. Is it not so? Or Russia. They look a little bit like Sami People.
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
I for one am offended by the name Redskins! Why should we have our Godly team named after a bunch of savages who open their Hedonistic church that they call casinos. The worship money above all else and are no better than the Jews in my honest opinion. Why should they have the privilege of having a major sports team named after them? :angry:
|
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Quote:
I still can't believe that the PTO gave them the trademark then revoked it. What a bunch of Indian givers! |
Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
Those Induns have been pillaging honest Americans, selling them swamp land, stealing livestock and women, scalping White men and generally acting like the bloodthirsty savages they are since the day we arrived to bring them Christian civilization. I cannot for the life of me understand how it is possible to disparage a godless savage by calling him a redskin.
Is not their skin red? I believe it would be better to go among them and finish our Christian duty than to listen to them complain. We started out just fine; there's hardly an Indun left on the East Coast, but as we moved west, we became backsliders and they multiplied. Now, they have more casinos than the Mafia. Those who do not worship pagan idols are Jehovah's Witnesses. They are mostly drunk most of the time. This complaining about being redskins is an abomination and something should be done about it. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved