Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;
Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
I wanted to take a go at this as well.
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Oooh, this is fun!
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
Quote:
I will put that as “unable to answer” . Quote:
That’s call compassion. You should try it sometimes. Quote:
Oh, so having a third arm would not be an advantage?? If someone had a third arm they would be able two work a third faster and get better jobs. Since you Darwinists claim Panda’s lost and re-grew their thumbs and third arm should be child’s play. Quote:
Face, your answers are weak. Worse they hypothetical because you lack direct observation. That is were we Creationists trump you, we have the ultimate direct observer; God. Now turn your lives over to Jesus. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
AN EVILutionist told me that he's 33% Daffodil and 98% Chimpanzee. I told him I'm 100% Jesus!
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Sure is, so I'll take a stab at yours as well.
Quote:
You guys probably are too narrow-minded to read this, but I'll post this link on the off-chance that some of you have a mind of your own. It basically goes through and disproves your "True Christian" God. http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/imposs.htm Oh, and don't take this picture too seriously or anything, just some humor, of course you probably won't take it that way though... :( http://www.positiveatheism.org/pix/callahan.jpg |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Welcome to the monkeyhouse!
Love your signature, btw. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
And his signature is nothing but the hateful spew of an old joo whose brain was riddled with holes from the syphilis he carried. Certainly nothing to be proud of. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Interesting thread.
Did you guys know that some of the theories on evolution dictate that first life was not even a whole cell formation? In fact they are stipulating that some of the organelles existed separate from cellular hosts. For example... Mitochondria has it own DNA. They believe that this organelle once lived outside of the cell, and of course by chance one happened to get with a cell and they began to live symbiotically. Now this does not even explain what happened to all the other exocellular mitochondria. I guess they all went and found their own cells to inhabit afterwards. No explanation as to why they did not attack each other, and whats even better is the fact that we have never witnessed an organelle natively living outside of a host. That does not even speak to the transition of prokaryotes or eukaryotes. It is true... evolution leaves MORE questions behind than it can even theorize an answer too. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
I'll take Jesus anytime. :jesus: |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
The way you describe it there was the magical mutation and poof, there is the land fish who lived happily ever after. The only mechanism I know of that causes sudden, dramatic and benevolent changes is God or at lest a god. So you are saying Charles Darwin intervened to give those fish their legs. God Himself never claims to have done that so the only other agent would be your false god Charles Darwin. |
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Quote:
Darwinism is a theory of evolution, I am simply an evolutionist. That does not require me to agree with that theory. Let me define mutation for you: Genetics
|
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
I'm just gonna take a wild guess here and please correct me if I'm wrong, humans evolved from one of two bipedal apes right? Then going back even further, like way way back the only things on the Earth were single cell orgamisms like bacteria. Well I watched a programme on the discovery channel I think in which they claimed that in our very distant past before man had evolved there were flying pigs, is that actually routed in any research or did they just decide to say that?
I think the concept of evolution is really interesting, I'm not really keen on the idea that my first ancestors must have commited incest since you know Eve was a part of Adam meaning they were (in someway) related. I just don't really see how that could work as animals generally send their sons away so that incest is not commited, an example would be Lions being sent away from their prides to start anew. Also is the reason no two humans look a like because we're constantly in a state of evolution, subtle but constant? Oh and also do you sometimes get people who are prevolved if that's the right term, like less evolved than they should be? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM. |
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved