Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
During the panic after the Sandy Hook unpleasantness, people were freaking out, so it was not the time to discuss gun control (but was still the perfect time to talk about censorship). Now it's time to move on, (though it's still a good time to talk about censorship).
But Obama refuses to move on, in fact he even thinks we're going to trust him to lower crime. Really? Let's take a look at the murder rates of other nations, compared to Obama's USSA: United States 5 Norway 0.6 Netherlands 0.93 Germany 0.86 Sweden 0.89 Switzerland 0.71 Denmark 1.01 France 1.31 Japan 1.02 You're five times more likely to be murdered in Obama's USSA than in Japan! Almost ten Times more likely than in Norway! In fact, when Obama took power in 2009 the murder rate became the same as in 1964 - the height of the Beatlemania crime wave! Based on a record like that, can you really trust Obama when he says he's going to deal with crime? Sure, he says he's only looking at small tweaks like limits on magazine sizes, or more background checks. Doesn't effect most gun owners, right? Wrong. The slippery-slope to total gun control tyranny is real: let's imagine what would happen if the smallest gun control measures were taken. Let's say, background checks to stop the insane from getting machine-guns. What would happen if Adam Lanza had to settle for a shotgun? First, the lower body count at Sandy Hook would mean less fears of gun-toting crazies, which is why people buy guns and ammo. Also, since Obama's election, fears of gun control have been a major reason for gun and ammo sales. Less fear means less sales, which means less money for the NRA, and therefore less money for Republican politicians. So, in short, the NRA and Republican politicians have a vested interest in more school shootings. We get paid every time a 6-year-old gets shot. I know it's brutal to think that we're basically in the dead-kid industry, but when you consider the consequences when the Dems win an election, the ends really do justify the means. On average, each dead kid is worth several million in campaign contributions, and I'd say that's worth it. But let's continue to ponder what would happen if the gun control movement continues. Worst case scenario, we might end up with a gun control regime like Japans: It's almost impossible to get to a gun in Japan, and selling one or owning one is a serious crime. Fire the gun? Possibly life imprisonment. Gun-control laws are taken so seriously that police will pursue a violator all the way to the grave — and maybe beyond... The only thing worse than gun control is bullet control. This tyrannical form of oppression is used in Switzerland, and also Japan: "The police are not given a free hand in using guns either. Internal controls make it very difficult for a gun or even a single bullet to fall into the hands of criminals.So as you can imagine, Japan is a land of tyranny and violence. Think it's just a coincidence that North Korea is right next to Japan? But overall, it's best to stay on the offensive. That means stop talking about guns and talk more about the real real reason America is more violent than other wealthy countries: because America, and only America, has violent media. Just look at some of the insane violence that American children - and only American children - are watching. As baby-boomers, our generation grew up thinking cartoon violence meant Bugs Bunny dropping an anvil on someone. Well, get ready for a shock as you see what this generation of children is watching: There seems to be a lot of swearing also, but since they're using some kind of urban slang ebonics thing I literally can't figure out a word they're saying. While the British only watch teletubbies, American kids are watching this: While the Japanese are watching Sailor Moon, and Astro-Boy, American kids are watching this: While Canadian kids are watching their igloos melt, American kids are watching this: Illegal crimmigrant anchor babies watch this one: Any surprise that there's so much violence in Obama's USSA? |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
OK so we have more murders. But we have less crimes overall - like pickpocketing, dope possession and jay walking. That's due to the successful policy that Rudy Guilliani called window dressing - or something to do with windows, I forget the exact name. Basically the idea is you come down hard on teenage criminals, life imprisonment etc, so they can't damage your property (e.g. your windows).
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Japan's laws would never work in America as so many people already have guns and would be unwilling to give them up.
The idea of dead American kids fuelling the republican economy is interesting, would you feel the same if it were your own kids though? I mean, I guess you could breed a few extra with that in mind and it wouldn't impact God's growing army that much, what are your opinions? |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
I blame the blacks and Mexicans. America would be a utopia again if not for the mongrel non-whites who use guns irresponsibly like Lanza, Whitman, Dillinger, Holmes, Loughner, Hennard and Cho.
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
That's just the tip of the iceberg on why we don't need all these coloreds running around, doing as they please. It's time we start taking God's advice on how to minister to the darkies.
Titus 2:9-10 Exhort servants to be obedient unto their own masters, and to please them well in all things; not answering again; Not purloining, but shewing all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things. Negroes and wetbacks are far too willful these days. Truly, we are approaching the End Times. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Lanza was white, I dunno who the others are so I can't comment on them.... |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, and as for this idea of not commenting on what you don't know...It's a fast paced world these days. A manly go-getter doesn't waste time and productivity finding out the facts. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
You know what all school shootings have in common? It's so obvious, it's right there in the name!
To get rid of school shootings, all you have to do is get rid of school! After all, schools are obsolete now, today's jobs don't use math or biology or, in southwestern states, even English. With Mexicans doing agriculture and the Chinese doing manufacturing, the service industry is the real employer. You don't need a decade of education to learn to say "would you like fries with that?" Just look at the major employers in any proper republican town - payday loan sharks, pawn shops, "gentleman's clubs", prisons....You don't need schooling to work there. The only places that book-learning mumbo-jumbo are liberal places, useless economic deadweights that we're better off without. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Aaron Alexis, Washington Navy Yard shooter, had just returned "from a months-long assignment in Japan, Alexis expressed frustration to a former roommate in Fort Worth about how he was not paid properly by the company that contracted him to work for the Navy. Another roommate of Alexis said that he would frequently complain about being the victim of discrimination."
That's a major Japanese connection: clearly he was pushed over the edge by Japanese gun control, and anti-white racism. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
These studies simply confirm that living in the city is a bad choice. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Quote:
This guy on youtube can explain it better, best ideas I heard all day. |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Can I point out that those videos you pointed out as just american kids watch these videos, well they are available around the world and are watched by millions of kids in japan and england too. Also I live in england and the programs children watch now promote poor grammar and an unhealthy lifestyle but im certain that young toddlers and impressionable children are not allowed to watch shows that promote violence. Futhermore I am not putting my point of view across or saying you are incorrect in your original thesis which you aren't, just please fully check your facts before posting such things (just a suggestion).
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
I do not claim any authority and It was only a suggestion I never said he had too also I try to research things to my full ability before posting such things anywhere. And I claim to know these facts by doing research about them not just going on youtube and searching violent anime (no disrespect) because on youtube some things are available to the whole world and on other websites some of these videos are also streamed.
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
Quote:
:) |
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
|
Re: Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM. |
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved