A Clue to the Expulsion from The Garden of Eden
 

I read the following the other day in an article on a small snake that had become trapped in amber and it is powerful evidence that Creation is accurate and that it really did take place.

• Snakes: The oldest known snake fossils date from between 140 million and 167 million years ago, and come from the UK - Durlston Bay in Dorset to be exact. Eophis underwoodi was small - possibly a youngster, and lived in a marshy or swampy environment.

• Lizard: A small lizard discovered in rocks from the Italian Alps was confirmed this year as the earliest example of its kind. Megachirella wachtleri lived in the Triassic Period, about 240 million years ago. The find suggested that the group lizards belong to had evolved earlier than previously thought

If we ignore the carbon dating errors that have led so many so-called “scientists” down the Path to Perdition, then we see that there were lizards before there were snakes.

Ge:3:14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

Obviously, before God said that, lizards were very like snakes but afterwards the distinction became clear. Snakes did not have legs,but lizards did.

Another extract caught my eye:
So where does that leave evolution? 100 million years is quite enough time, allegedly, for a backbone to change, e.g. to grow wings or something, but no… nothing happened.

But there is more information to be gathered here!

If that snake were found in the UK, and
The Garden of Eden were in Mesopotamia,
And Mesopotamia is 2,300 miles away, from the UK
and if a snake can travel, say, 5 miles a day,
and the snake rests on the Sabbath,
and if the snake were in no hurry, and Godlessly rested 2 days a week,
and the snake, in Europe, hibernates from October to March
then the math is simple:

2,300 / 5 = 460 days + 460/(2/7) days = 591.428 days
Plus 6 months hibernation x 2 = 365 days
=956.428 days.

But the snake is “young”, therefore it is the result of breeding.

And a young snake will do little travelling in the first 6 months, so we add another 182.5 days, and another period of hibernation, 182.5 days = 365 days.

Now the way I see it is that an experienced snake would not climb an amber tree – so I reckon the snake reached the UK and, in its juvenile impatience, climbed a tree to see where it was. And it died.

Giving a total of 1138.928 days from its parent leaving Eden. That’s 3 years, one month and two weeks after Adam, Eve, and the parent snake were all expelled from Eden.

Re: A Clue to the Expulsion from The Garden of Eden
 

Astute observations there Brother Bathfire, and it proves once again that science properly done without secular and atheist biases confirms the Biblical account of creation.

Of particular interest here is the noted apparent lack of "evolution" in snakes (serpents), and the same could be said about women - they still possess the proclivity to listen to talking snakes, or in today's context - Democrats.

I think it's clear here in Genesis that God did not intend for women to vote - and note that they in large part tend to vote Democrat (and become Feminazis).

We further have to note that God did not intend for mankind to ever return to the Garden of Eden - posting menacing security guards at the entrance. Of course that hasn't stopped Satan from trying to form another "Garden of Eden" elsewhere on earth - if you happen to be listening to all the commies and socialists bantering about. Yes, the talking snakes (Democrats) are still with us - Obama, Bernie Sanders, Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown, and now Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Much like the Tower of Babel in the Bible (KJV1611), God has a way of making sure this doesn't happen - turning every attempt into shithole countries like Venezuela.

Re: A Clue to the Expulsion from The Garden of Eden
 

Would the radiation from their synchrotron, at whatever wavelength they hived off, have an effect on the radiometric dating? Although nuclear power plants kill far fewer people that alternatives such as coal overall, when they explode there's quite a lot of radio hanging around for ages. Is it any wonder that dating technique gets thrown off kilter?

If this serpent arrived in Dorset anno mundi 1138.928 days then later became irradiated in the synchrotron (or part thereof) to produce a false reading, can we say there's a conversion factor of
48,071,520 approx. based on a median estimate of ca150 million yrs according to post-irradiation radiometry? Or whatever they were doing?

Perhaps I've misunderstood, but if science goggles give errors in the 50million range that could be very useful for funding and I imagine synchrotrons are n/a from the $2 shop..

Re: A Clue to the Expulsion from The Garden of Eden
 

You have not misunderstood at all. This is exactly what Christians have been saying about "radio-active dating" for years! If you go messing with plutonium, you're going to get cross-infection and your figures are going to be wildly out.

We know when Earth was created - why do we need someone to invent a far more complex and far less accurate way of telling us?