The Landover Baptist Church Forum

The Landover Baptist Church Forum (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumindex.php)
-   Landover Baptist Lounge (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   "Redskins" Is Offensive Now? (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=99928)

Mary Etheldreda 06-19-2014 04:28 AM

"Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
CNN is trying to explain, but I'm not sure I understand:

Quote:

In a decision released Wednesday, the office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that "these registrations must be canceled because they were disparaging to Native Americans."
CNN video

I don't understand. Indians have red skin. Why is that offensive? I don't mind being called a lady, because that's what I am. If someone says I have fair, flawless skin, I don't cry and try to sue them. Because it's true. Just like Indians and their red skin.

Can someone please explain?


http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/.../9Tza5baTE.png

Levi Jones 06-19-2014 05:33 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
I don't get it, sister. In our world, we call a spade a spade.

It don't know why they dance :giggle: around the issue.

Just look at this redskin all ready to rape and pillage.

http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/b...01/6630400.jpg

Mother Of Seven 06-19-2014 09:33 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
How is anyone meant to distinguish between dot injuns and redskin injuns then? :confused:
They might have to rename them the Washington Injuns, but then all the turbanheads will think it's their team.

Walter Van Slyke 06-19-2014 04:00 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
This is clearly the work of insidious liberals who never rest at trying to undermine every great American institution.

I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays. As for me, I'll continue to root for my beloved Patriots, who have the most Godly name in football. (Not the Saints, who are named after cathylick idols.)

Mary Etheldreda 06-19-2014 05:07 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Levi Jones (Post 1095263)
I
Just look at this redskin all ready to rape and pillage.

That's just the thing, Brother. You'd think a savage race like the red indians would appreciate some positive attention, you know?

:huh:

Attila's Wife 06-19-2014 05:20 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
So what are they supposed to call themselves? The Washington Native Americans? Because that term discriminates against all other Americans, by which I mean Real Americans, good folk who were born in the USA and are therefore "native" to the country.

This is just disgusting and there should be an international protest.

Bobby-Joe 06-19-2014 07:23 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Rep Steven King has the explain Sister

https://twitter.com/SteveKingIA

Quote:

Obama raids Redskins by weaponizing USPTO. Cancels Redskins logo! Free people will not tolerate a Kim Jong POTUS.

John Creeser 06-19-2014 08:20 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Attila's Wife (Post 1095331)
So what are they supposed to call themselves? The Washington Native Americans? Because that term discriminates against all other Americans, by which I mean Real Americans, good folk who were born in the USA and are therefore "native" to the country.

THIS^^^^

What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)? I know the beaners jump the border, so they're from Mexico. They call themselves Indians but I've yet to see a dothead flail around with dead birds on their heads.

Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air! I think it's shameful we honor them with an AMERICAN football team (when we have no idea where they originated) and they stab us right in the back. :angry:

Who is next? The White Sox, for being racist?

Johny Joe Hold 06-20-2014 02:52 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Creeser (Post 1095354)
THIS^^^^

What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)?

Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air!


I've wondered for years where they came from. They are always complaining about their treatment here. If they had just stayed in whatever country they are from they wouldn't have these problems.

Mother Of Seven 06-20-2014 03:30 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Didn't they come from Canuckistan?

Talitha 06-20-2014 08:03 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Creeser (Post 1095354)
THIS^^^^

What I want to know is....where the hell did they come from in the first place (and in such abundance)? I know the beaners jump the border, so they're from Mexico. They call themselves Indians but I've yet to see a dothead flail around with dead birds on their heads.

Seriously, it's like they just popped out of thin air! I think it's shameful we honor them with an AMERICAN football team (when we have no idea where they originated) and they stab us right in the back. :angry:

Who is next? The White Sox, for being racist?

They must be a kind of dot-head and obviously either swam or came over in boats while our founding fathers weren't looking so they could try and pre-steal America.
God gave white folk this country for a reason.

Attila's Wife 06-20-2014 08:38 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Talitha (Post 1095457)
They must be a kind of dot-head and obviously either swam or came over in boats while our founding fathers weren't looking so they could try and pre-steal America.
God gave white folk this country for a reason.

Can they swim, sister? I thought they were allergic to water - both to getting it on their skin and to drinking it.

Mother Of Seven 06-20-2014 08:43 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Attila's Wife (Post 1095463)
Can they swim, sister? I thought they were allergic to water - both to getting it on their skin and to drinking it.

They're not English, you know.

Cranky Old Man 06-20-2014 11:17 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
I never understand all these red, yellow and black people complaining about racism all the time. If they took regular baths and had jobs they would look just like decent white Republican Christians.

http://i.imgur.com/Vkjig9O.png

Marko Loimaan-Aho 06-20-2014 12:09 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
I've always thought they are immigrants from India. Is it not so? Or Russia. They look a little bit like Sami People.

Pastor Isaac Peters 06-20-2014 02:35 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Walter Van Slyke (Post 1095325)
I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays.

They might as well. Both the city whose name they bear and the state in which their stadium is actually located are hotbeds of fag-enabling.

Jimmy-Roy Stewart 06-20-2014 02:41 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Walter Van Slyke (Post 1095325)
This is clearly the work of insidious liberals who never rest at trying to undermine every great American institution.

I wouldn't be surprised if they named the team the Washington Gays. As for me, I'll continue to root for my beloved Patriots, who have the most Godly name in football. (Not the Saints, who are named after cathylick idols.)

It wouldnt' suprise me neither we cant' hurt the feelings of the injins and we have to give special consderation to queers its' all about every one accept us straight white Christian males its' perfectly okay to persectue us.

Blind Faith 06-20-2014 10:15 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
I for one am offended by the name Redskins! Why should we have our Godly team named after a bunch of savages who open their Hedonistic church that they call casinos. The worship money above all else and are no better than the Jews in my honest opinion. Why should they have the privilege of having a major sports team named after them? :angry:

WWJDnow 06-20-2014 10:20 PM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blind Faith (Post 1095570)
I for one am offended by the name Redskins! Why should we have our Godly team named after a bunch of savages who open their Hedonistic church that they call casinos. The worship money above all else and are no better than the Jews in my honest opinion. Why should they have the privilege of having a major sports team named after them? :angry:

If they were honest, the team would be called the blackskins.

I still can't believe that the PTO gave them the trademark then revoked it. What a bunch of Indian givers!

Alvin Moss 06-21-2014 12:19 AM

Re: "Redskins" Is Offensive Now?
 
Those Induns have been pillaging honest Americans, selling them swamp land, stealing livestock and women, scalping White men and generally acting like the bloodthirsty savages they are since the day we arrived to bring them Christian civilization. I cannot for the life of me understand how it is possible to disparage a godless savage by calling him a redskin.

Is not their skin red?

I believe it would be better to go among them and finish our Christian duty than to listen to them complain. We started out just fine; there's hardly an Indun left on the East Coast, but as we moved west, we became backsliders and they multiplied.

Now, they have more casinos than the Mafia. Those who do not worship pagan idols are Jehovah's Witnesses. They are mostly drunk most of the time.

This complaining about being redskins is an abomination and something should be done about it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved