Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Praise Jesus and His sense of humor. When I saw THIS story, I just knew that He had tossed a few stumbling blocks in front of those secular scienticians, and forced them to answer one of the big objections those atheists have always had against the Biblical story of the Great Flood:
"If God covered the earth in water for 40 days and 40 nights, then where did all that water go?" Well here's your answer. :gleam: Quote:
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Modern secular science is purely made-up stuff to explain that which people can't otherwise understand. So because secular science couldn't understand where all the water went, they said that the great flood never happened. And they call that science!
Now that we know all the water is stored underground, that theory of theirs falls apart. All we need now is few more things like that to happen, and the scientists will have to close up shop and go home, admitting that everything in the Bible is in fact, true! :) |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
That's what secular science is all about, you could say that they brag about having anything they don't know, finding an answer to it. I think what they mean to say, is that they are creative, and good at making up random answers that make no sense, so they can continue to ignore the bible. That shouldn't even be called science, it's just a version of the things pre-schoolers do when they're bored, make random stuff up. At least the Christians are mature enough to know that we don't need to make stuff up, it's all written down for us, as fact, in the bible.
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
Did you notice the "Under Investigation" has disappeared from beneath your username? |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Mr Much, Leave the poor lady alone. If I weren't so much of a lady, I would be telling you in no uncertain terms, where you could go. And it's the same place that you'll end up when you breathe your last breath on this earth.
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
I'm sorry, MoS, and never meant to cause you distress. :(
The young lady has shown greater aptitude at sharing her nonBiblicly-supported opinions than familiarizing herself with the Scripture she professes is the absolute Truth™, you must admit. As for her being Christian, has she even been baptized*? :hmmm: *being baptized as a baby doesn't count here, of course |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
I will probably take a few days off of this website then, so I can immerse myself in learning the bible's words without distraction. I hope to be back soon, and to be a much better Christian than I am now, at my return. Mother Of Seven, thank you for being so nice to me during my, albeit short, stay here so far. I look forward to more conversations in the future. Yours in Christ :jesus: |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Perhaps soon our country can return gloriously to our Cristian roost, proving science is lies and the word of Satin! Pray to the LORD!
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
How are you a Satanist if you don't know how to spell Satan? on a keyboard, the letters I and A are very far from each other.... Anyway, this is the question that I always ask Satanists, one has yet to be brave enough to respond. If you know Satan is real, you must know God is real, for Satan is God's enemy, set to reside in Hell to torture people. So, if you know Satan exists, and therefore know God exists, why would you purposefully choose Hell over Heaven? |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
I fail to see how this proves that the flood happened? It only says that their studies suggest that there's an underwater ocean.
But how could a flood happen with all these problems ? : 2: Noah's ark: How could a flood happen when things such as old tjikko ( a 9.5k years old tree ) still exists? It would have died underwater. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10 ky) climatic conditions. And I could go on, even the concept of noah's ark doesn't apply to reality. Wood is not the best material for shipbuilding. It is not enough that a ship be built to hold together; it must also be sturdy enough that the changing stresses don't open gaps in its hull. Wood is simply not strong enough to prevent separation between the joints, especially in the heavy seas that the Ark would have encountered. The longest wooden ships in modern seas are about 300 feet, and these require reinforcing with iron straps and leak so badly they must be constantly pumped. The ark was 450 feet long [ Gen. 6:15]. Could an ark that size be made seaworthy? No, because look what happened to the Wyoming , with the effect called hogging and sagging caused by waves, it would twist in every direction causing it to leak and eventualy sank. |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
2) So you really think that a Being, that predates time and space, in fact CREATED time and space and everything in it, would have the slightest problem fitting whatever He wanted into however flimsy, ill-proportioned, hydraulically unstable wooden piece of cr*p He could convince some 500 year old guy and his three sons to spend 100 years building and keep it afloat (through the storms that He also created and controlled) for a while? Seriously? |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
What you're saying is silly, because you're saying god made everything look as if the flood would have been impossible ( hiding the proofs that it happened ), that he bended physics magically to make some farmer float. Why are there no traces of these miracles today? Where's the ark? Why are there's no proof for god after hundreds of years? |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
:huh: |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
|
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
But if you keep saying it over and over, people will believe you then, right? :D |
Re: Scientists Accidentally Prove The Flood Was Real!
Quote:
Scientists are free to make up all kinds of unverifiable and unfalsfiable nonsense (like the alleged age of this tree) and people just accept it without question because, hey, it's science! For what it's worth, experience is also a terrible way of gathering knowledge. How can you observe anything and declare it true when you can't prove that your eyes are capable of observing truth? God's existence is a priori true so we don't have any such problems. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 AM. |
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved